Voters spoilt for choice: Peter Albanese or Anthony Dutton

Labor-Greens advocate virtuous (UN/OECD/IMF troika) renewables with Liberal baddies going nuclear.

About 30 nations operate 400-plus nuclear power plants worldwide, US and China being top generators. France is 70% nuclear, though the waste backstory worries.

Australia could do nuclear – if preferring the industry's rosy picture to national CSIRO's anointing of renewables.

But we're mediocre infrastructure builders. "Externalities" from resource mining, power plants, waste disposal, might descend unfairly, including on Indigenous lands.

Unlike Qatar/Norway, Liberal/Labor siphon the resource booty off to rent-seekers ahead of voters. Nuclear, unlikely as it is to happen, would be another rent-seeker pile-on.

For reliability of electricity supply, maybe Liberals should stick to their "gas-fired recovery" trope, with less of the "dramatically" increasing supply.

Eighty percent-export gas-cartel is bad enough, with gleeful trading "partners" on-selling gas imported from dozy Australia. Soon, they'll sell it back to us.

Suits troika. Not a shot fired, they've replaced our fair-go with UN social-justice creed:

Population growth + renewables growth = environment-repair + net-zero.