Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Voters spoilt for choice: Peter Albanese or Anthony Dutton

By Stephen Saunders - posted Wednesday, 15 January 2025


These Treasury talking points are how current Treasurer "communicates" with Australians. How's his MYEFO helping them? With subsidiary talking points.

Easing cost-of-living pressures (why make it so hard to start with). Future Made in Australia (see above). Strengthening the "care" economy (care is not the economy). Broadening opportunity and equality (in reverse) while safeguarding people and environment (until the next fire/flood/pandemic).

"Australians are struggling to get into the housing market" though over "a million jobs have been created".

Advertisement

Why struggling? Bipartisan tax-incentives for housing speculation – augmented by Labor's million-plus migrants to date. Who got those (largely government-related) "million" jobs? A million migrants, mainly.

NSW Liberals dissed MYEFO. If their party wins federally, it's still Treasury Rules.

As to who really chooses our policy directions, you can have unelected "stakeholders" or unelected international agencies (UN/OECD/IMF troika). Rarely voters.

Then Treasurer issued Australia's fifth Population Statement, a Scott Morrison lurk. Media "stakeholders" (ABC, SMH, Financial Review) copied out the Treasury points.

Bizarrely, the 2022 Statement said our population was trending "smaller and older". Edition 2024, however, has population still "growing in 2100":

Not even United Nations would say that. Our central government has lost its environmental mind. Does no one care?

Advertisement

Despite population growth (> 2%) doubling economic growth (< 1%), there's no concession that hyper migration hurts voters. We'll all "benefit", smirks Treasury, as the population zooms past 30 million then 40.

Treasury has demolished the Australian Dream with world-level population-replacement plus world-level housing-unaffordability. Yet they fantasise 2030s women (even Canberra women) re-embracing fertility via:

"Policies that encourage a more equal division of household labour, alleviate the financial cost of having children, and promote housing security."

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy