Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

ANU Migration Hub – immigration gaslighter of the year

By Stephen Saunders - posted Tuesday, 17 December 2024


Over Labor's whole term of 2022-25, net migration will accumulate easily our biggest three-year streak in history, something close to 1.5 million. Nearly doubling Rudd's herculean three-year effort. Surely, wiping any "shortfall", had there ever been one in the first place.

Yet the author dilutes the record-high migration down to a mere "claim". ABS stats aren't claims - they're a primary source. Neither are we "far from" catching up on "lost" migration. We've more than caught up.

Also, the assertion of "less [total] migration since the onset of the pandemic" is misleading.

Advertisement

As above, net migration for the 2019-2024 period is nearly 1,300,000. Net migration for the five years prior was "only" about 1,130,000.

The later period, despite its inclusion of COVID, has greater not lesser migration. But here's the thing. Both periods have pushed migration way too high. It's a side-argument about nothing much.

And net - not "total" - migration remains as our more useful indicator of ongoing immigration volumes and the impact on our ongoing infrastructure and service requirements.

The author, however, deprecates it. For ABC purposes, he garbled it as a "derivative of a basket of a bunch of different things…not a useful way to track migrant numbers".

Similarly, another new Hub "Insight" by ex-ANU immigration advocate Peter McDonald nukes net-migration as "slippery". Beguiling the Home Affairs officials and media, that the Albanese net-migration figures might just be more about lower "departures " than higher arrivals.

Forty seasons of ABS stats would appear to indicate otherwise.

Advertisement

Touch wood, net migration, though imperfect and subject to revisions, still appeals as the least disreputable and most serviceable measure. It's what's used in ABS/Treasury immigration/population estimates. Net migration + natural increase = Population growth.

Sure, the UN and big OECD nations may define net migration in slightly different terms.

But at least, the net figures allow academic and laypersons alike, to compare Australia's immigration momentum to that of other advanced nations, on broadly similar terms. To find, it's remarkably high at present, around 1.6% or more of population. The figure for the OECD bloc is 0.5% or less.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy