Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Budget: population porkies for Big Australia

By Stephen Saunders - posted Tuesday, 1 November 2022


Between now and mid 2029, the Budget programs 1.5 million net migration (highly likely) versus an extra million new homes (less likely). That should fix the housing crisis - not.

"Decentralisation" culture predates Arthur Calwell's 1945 "Populate or Perish". 1970s Labor birthed Albury-Wodonga. 1980s Labor floated a zany Multifunction Polis. Canberra, our one world-ranked decentralisation, was derided by Morrison.

A 2015 White Paper urges over-damming the "empty" north, while Rudd imagines 50 million Australians. Presently, "regional" permanent migration claims less than 10% of total.

Advertisement

Disregarding politicians' congestion/decentralisation theatre, Sydney-Melbourne will surge from 10 million, to 15-16 million or more by 2050.

Fib: Our greenhouse emissions can decouple from population growth

UN net zero emissions (by 2050) is the new black. Silo admires the alluring arithmetic of carbon sinks "netting" out human emissions. Eventually.

Inexorably the eight billion humans are causal in 70% biodiversity crash. Rich nations are emissions gluttons. Poor nations' surging population exacerbates environmental degradation and climate change. Stalemate.

Mugged by Matt Kean, Morrison nominally endorsed net zero. Albanese has legislated a "43%" reduction on 2005 emissions by 2030. Improbable, but EU's happy.

Omitting suss deductions re "Land-use, Land-use Change and Forestry", our emissions actually rose, most of 2005-2020. Renewables-led transition to "43%" or "net zero" is contradicted by booming population, bulldozing bush, fossil fuel extraction.

Advertisement

Via Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, even UN (sort of) concedes population growth and GDP-per-capita are the strongest drivers of global emissions. These two outpace offsetting reductions in energy-use per GDP unit.

Earthwise, population growth is hard to corral. Easy, for Island Australia. Albanese does the direct opposite. While tinkering with ineffectual carbon "credits".

Fib: Mass migration counters population and workforce ageing

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy