Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Budget: population porkies for Big Australia

By Stephen Saunders - posted Tuesday, 1 November 2022


A shop-worn fib. "Ageing" population and workforce mean increasing dependency ratios and drains on Budget. Requiring mega-migration relays.

Migrants also age. The "rejuvenation" is temporary and minor, but for repetitive top-ups. That is, the only answer to more migration is more migration.

Longevity is a societal plus not minus. US longevity is going backwards.

Advertisement

Silo "rejuvenation" hustlers spread alarm about failing health, health costs, sluggish revenues, faltering productivity. If anything, population ageing can lift productivity and participation. But Treasury Intergenerational Reports pre-load a Big Australia.

Fib: Opposition to mass migration must be racist

The "Racist Card" disciplines speech around immigration. Nixes prudent population policy.

Exbibit A: Shadow Immigration Minister Kristina Keneally, veering off script in 2020. Said she, the recent "size and shape" of immigration has "hurt many Australian workers, contributing to unemployment, underemployment and low wage growth."

What, Australian Labor backing Australian labour? Silo economists were scandalised. Team Albanese flashed her the Card. Had her walk back the words. And worse.

The centralised imposition of mass migration is of itself discriminatory. Australia preferences UN immigration policies ahead of local constituents.

Advertisement

In bipartisan rhetoric, new migrants ace business and job creation. Closer to truth, all-time immigration influxes flatten wages and living amenity.

Explains why the majority dislikes Big Australia. Sure, migrants still have to fend off racists. Such persons are so 1945. Fait accompli, we're a multicultural migrant nation.

Recent migrants tend to assimilate to local immigration preferences. Even in western Sydney. Recall Bill Shorten's election fizzog - uncapped migrant parent visas.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy