Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

An alternative budget

By David Leyonhjelm - posted Thursday, 28 April 2016


If we were in Government, these spending cuts are a fraction of what the Liberal Democrats would pursue. Our policies include major reform to the big ticket items of welfare, health, education, and defence, and the abolition of all grants to the States, forcing them to manage their own finances. 

The spending cuts the Liberal Democrats propose would not only balance the budget and repay debt, but would facilitate abolition of taxes on alcohol, fuel, tobacco and imports, allow the tax free threshold to be lifted to $40,000, and allow personal income tax and company tax rates to be reduced to a flat 20 per cent. 

By comparison, the proposal outlined in this alternative budget – which achieves a balance simply by shaving spending – is very modest.  There is no reason it could not be implemented.

Advertisement

A budget to set the election agenda

A balanced budget would set the agenda for months to come.  We would continue to discuss the footy, traffic jams and the Batman v Superman movie, but injected into these conversations would be comments about what the government is doing. 

Over the weeks between the budget and the election, begrudging acceptance that balancing the budget is the responsible thing to do would develop.  A café manager may overhear a customer sticking up for the budget, saying: “Why shouldn’t the budget be balanced?”  A publican may hear drinkers debate the budget across the bar, saying: “What would you do instead?”  And amid all the phone watching and thumb twiddling on the bus or train, one may even hear comments like: “But we all have to pay off our credit card.”

The imperative to balance the budget is undeniable, and as my proposals demonstrate, it would not be hard to achieve. All it requires is some gumption from Turnbull and Morrison. Let’s hope they have it.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All

This article was first published in the Australian Financial Review.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Leyonhjelm is a former Senator for the Liberal Democrats.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Leyonhjelm

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Leyonhjelm
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy