Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The election best lost

By Tim O'Hare - posted Thursday, 12 February 2015

The Queensland election is over and Labor has defied the odds and gone from a netball team to what looks to be shaping up to be a minority government with the support of independent Peter Wellington.

Social media is exploding with pro-Labor sentiment and political commentators are speculating about what this means for Tony Abbott and his government.

What's missing is an assessment of what Labor and Annastacia Palaszczuk will do now that they have defied even their own expectation and won government.


Labor's strategy was in Palaszczuk's words to run 'a referendum on asset sales', an extraordinary single-issue campaign against a policy they advocated at the 2012 election, and it worked.

Labor mobilised a groundswell of grass-roots, anti-privatisation sentiment complete with a close working relationship with the union movement and a formidable campaign by the external organisation Not4Sale.

This has also brought Labor closer to its splintering working-class base, through playing to their hysteria around private ownership.

The only problem with this strategy was that it worked, far too well in fact.

As a result the Labor Party has won a mandate to oppose the asset sales that they were hoping the LNP would make.

The last two terms have seen both Premiers back-flip on their pledge not to sell assets.


Commentators are quick to assert the toxicity of asset privatisation, what's often overlooked is perhaps the necessity of it given that leaders across the aisle are willing to sacrifice their reputations for it.

For these reasons its always been in Labor's interests to let the LNP expend its political capital on asset privatisation, while future ALP governments reap the economic benefits of privatisation.

Unfortunately when Labor tried to run a single-issue, protest-vote campaign against asset sales in order to pick up more seats, consequently Labor has unexpectedly fallen into government.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tim O’Hare is a Sydney-based, freelance commentator, originally from Brisbane. He has written about a range of subjects and particularly enjoys commenting on the culture wars and the intersection between politics, culture, sport, and the arts.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tim O'Hare

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tim O'Hare
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy