Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Audit commissions - a review

By Scott Prasser and Kate Jones - posted Friday, 24 January 2014


Two eras of audit commissions have been identified.

In the first era from 1988 to 1996 seven commissions of audit were established: one in each of the six states, and one by the Commonwealth. The first was New South Wales, in 1988, followed by Tasmania and Victoria in 1992, Western Australia and South Australia in 1993, and Queensland and the Commonwealth in 1996.

There was then a 12-year hiatus when no commissions were appointed, reflecting the dominance of Labor governments across Australia during that period.

Advertisement

Then between 2008 to 2013 another seven commissions of audit have been established: Western Australia in 2008; South Australia in 2009; Victoria and New South Wales in 2011; Queensland and the Northern Territory in 2012; and as noted the Commonwealth in 2013.

Of the states, only Tasmania (which has had a Labor government since 1998) did not establish an audit commission during this second period.

Why appointed?

There are several features about governments appointing audit commissions.

First, with the exception of the South Australia's 2009 body, all audit commissions have been established by incoming non-Labor governments.

Second, again with the exception of South Australia and of Queensland in 1996, and this is an extremely important point, the appointing governments had been out of office for considerable periods.

Advertisement

Third, in most, but not all cases (eg Queensland in 1996), the incoming non-Labor governments inherited poor or near calamitous budgetary situations.

Thus, audit commissions, composed as they were mostly by outsiders, often, but not wholly, from the business sector, were appointed by these new non-Labor governments: partly because they were suspicious of the public bureaucracy which they perceived as being politicised and also part of the problem; partly because of the perceived need for urgent action to address budgetary problems hence their tight timeframes; partly because cutting government reflected ideological preferences of non-Labor governments. However, on this latter point, although audit commissions can be seen to have an ideological mission, many of their proposals were also becoming mainstream remedies in public sector management regardless of who was in power.

Impacts

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

An edited version of this article has been published in Public Administration Today.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Dr Scott Prasser has worked on senior policy and research roles in federal and state governments. His recent publications include:Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia (2021); The Whitlam Era with David Clune (2022), the edited New directions in royal commission and public inquiries: Do we need them? and The Art of Opposition (2024)reviewing oppositions across Australia and internationally.


Kate Jones was a research fellow at the Public Policy Institute and a graduate of the University of Sydney, the University of Melbourne and La Trobe University. She has worked in the Commonwealth and Victorian parliaments and in other positions in the Victorian and Commonwealth public sectors. Before commencing at the Public Policy Institute she held positions at La Trobe University and in another research centre at Australian Catholic University.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Scott Prasser
All articles by Kate Jones

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Scott PrasserScott PrasserPhoto of Kate JonesKate Jones
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy