Re-nationalising the airline industry ... a sink or soar government decision?

Proposals by the Albanese government that it might buy the financially stressed Rex Airline - which has $500 million of debt - if no private buyer can be found is reminiscent of the Chifley Labor government's failed attempt to nationalise the country's airlines and banks during the 1940s.

Let's not forget the government has already provided $130 million in debt repayment and support to keep Rex's planes flying to its many regional destinations.

The federal government is preparing to step in and nationalise regional airline Rex if a private buyer cannot be found.

Nationalisation of private enterprises was all the rage in the 1940s to fill market gaps left by the private sector, provide services to certain places, set the pace in wages and conditions, and to maintain employment in certain industries.

But it has long been out of favour and deemed an all-round policy failure.

The Menzies-led Liberal opposition opposed Chifley's bank and airline nationalisation, successfully making it a point of difference at the 1949 landslide election. Since then, such government businesses have gradually been sold off by both Commonwealth and state governments, though some notable ones remain.

The Hawke-Keating Labor governments' microeconomic reforms led to the privatisation of Qantas in 1993. State banks and insurance office and printing enterprises, communication bodies and others have all gone the privatisation route - largely for the better.

Government ownership and nationalised industries mean every decision becomes a political one. What services are provided, staffing numbers, wage rates and investment decisions are all made on short term political rather than financial or economic criteria.

Usually, nationalised industries get starved of investment, services and products become out of date, they are prone to over-staffing and featherbedding, innovation is stifled and flexibility and initiative frozen.

Nationalised enterprises inevitably are run like any government department where process and hierarchy dominate. Workers and management know that whatever mistakes occur, whatever the costs overruns, whatever consumers dislike, whatever the size of the losses, whatever the shoddiness of the product, government will always bail them out, so why bother to strive for efficiency or to grow market share?

Owning two English cars, I have experienced the products of a nationalised industry - British Leyland. Taken over by the British government, it cost billions to pay out its debt and more billions to keep it going. It mostly ran at a loss, producing, with a few exceptions, shoddily built, out-of-date, and expensive cars easily outperformed by their Japanese and German rivals. It was plagued by strikes, outdated work practices, assembly line sabotage, weak and confused management, and poor product development. Even when Leyland was on the cusp of producing a potential winner, the opportunity was usually missed. Margaret Thatcher eventually sold Leyland off and it disappeared, with the other companies picking up its worthwhile bits.