Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Shutting down debate on abortion is a concern for us all

By Scott Prasser - posted Wednesday, 15 January 2025


Late lst year the new LNP Queensland premier, David Crisafulli, successfully moved a motion in parliament that there be “no bill or amendment” and “no motion or amendment” over the term of the government to the Labor inherited liberal Termination of Pregnancy Act 2018 that controls abortion.

This means that the Queensland parliament cannot discuss, ask questions, make representations, draft amendments or even accept citizens’ petitions expressing concerns about its own legislation on abortion.

Crisafulli’s actions are unprecedented in executive government suppression of parliamentary debate across not only in Queensland’s much derided unicameral parliamentary system even under the premiership of Joh Bjelke-Petersen, but across most other Westminster systems.   

Advertisement

The abortion issue had arisen during the recent state election as the outgoing Labor Party sought, with some success, to retain their Brisbane inner suburban seats by campaigning that an LNP government would reverse current laws and make it harder to access abortion.

Although Crisafulli had firmly ruled out any changes to abortion laws during and since the election, he argues this suppression order was necessary because Labor’s “grubby … disgraceful scare campaign” had created “victims” among “many young women and first-time voters” fearful of future changes. The order seeks to allay these fears more resolutely. 

The Labor opposition suggested the ban was more so Crisafulli could keep his LNP members in line given some had expressed concern with the current laws. It would also prevent the conservative Katter Australian Party submitting private members’ bills to amend the legislation causing division within LNP ranks as occurred during the election campaign.

The issue is not whether you agree or disagree with the current abortion laws, but whether executive government should be able to terminate all discussion and debate about any issue, including one as important as this.

Certainly, all governments in Westminster systems use their numbers to guillotine legislation and to limit debates so legislation can be quickly passed. We saw that recently when the Albanese government passed a raft of bills through the Senate with little debate. The Morrison government did the same to pass legislation quickly during the pandemic. 

But that is quite different from executive government completely suppressing any discussion about a major policy issue as Crisafulli has now done. 

Advertisement

It is It is rejection of the 1989 Fitzgerald commission’s findings which highlighted how Queensland’s executive control of parliament was an underlying cause of corruption. 

It is a contradiction of Queensland Parliament’s own website which states that “members of parliament enjoy a unique privilege of freedom of speech, derived from Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1688, Article 9”. 

It ignores that parliament does not exist merely for the convenience of executive government but is expected to provide a forum to hold ministers to account, promote debate, hear alternative policies and to air citizens’ grievances whatever they may be. 

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Scott Prasser has worked on senior policy and research roles in federal and state governments. His recent publications include:Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia (2021); The Whitlam Era with David Clune (2022), the edited New directions in royal commission and public inquiries: Do we need them? and The Art of Opposition (2024)reviewing oppositions across Australia and internationally.


Other articles by this Author

All articles by Scott Prasser

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Scott Prasser
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy