Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Making the Senate work efficiently is an imperative for the 21st century

By Helen Coonan - posted Friday, 7 November 2003


An efficient and hard-working Senate, scrutinising, criticising and examining legislation and keeping the government accountable, is a great institutional safeguard for all Australians.

But when the Senate crosses the line and acts as an obstructional competitor to the democratically elected government of the day, frustrating or substantially delaying urgently required responses to national problems or insisting on its own policy, it is no longer a House of Review but a House of Obstruction.

Critics of Senate reform will point to the fact that most legislation gets through in the end. This obscures the importance of bills that are obstructed or delayed.

Advertisement

The reforms that have been implemented have only been achieved with the support of minor parties or independents.

Minority parties and independents are an essential part of a democracy where power is well distributed throughout the institutions of government.

Where it becomes untenable however, is when no compromise can be reached, other than complete capitulation by the government.

It is not in Australia's interests to have what we have now, two competing governments with almost equal and opposite mandates to govern.

These problems were recognised at Federation.

What Federation required in achieving a union between the existing colonial states (the Original States) was a geographical distribution of votes in the Senate as a balance to the greater numerical representation in the House of Representatives of the most populous states.

Advertisement

Whatever the founders may have intended, it is clear that the Senate does not function as a states' House.

Any expectation that Senators would vote in a block according to the state they represent is unsupportable, not the least because of the emergence of rigid party discipline which presently controls all but four independent Senators and also because in a Federal democracy the Senate does not represent states' rights but rather represents electors voting by their states.

There is no escaping the theoretical difficulties in reconciling federalism and responsible cabinet government in the institutional design.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Article edited by Rick Brown.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This article is based on a speech delivered to The Brisbane Institute on 21 October 2003.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Senator Hon. Helen Coonan is Federal Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer. She is a Senator for NSW.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Helen Coonan
Related Links
Liberal Party of Australia
Resolving Deadlocks
Photo of Helen Coonan
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from The Brisbane Institute
 The pursuit of terrorists post September 11: be afraid, be very afraid
 The politics of country music
 Confronting our water challenge
 Hanging on to paradise
 Taxing Australian federalism
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy