Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

No joy for the 'boys' on the campaign bus

By John Harrison - posted Wednesday, 28 November 2007


The Boys on the Bus is a political campaign classic in which Tim Crouse covers the journalists covering the 1972 Nixon-McGovern presidential race. It was one of the first books to expose the inner workings of the symbiotic relationship between journalists and political campaigners. The Australian equivalent was Mungo McCallum’s Mungo on the Zoo Plane (1978). The zoo plane in US parlance was the third campaign jet that carried foreign correspondents and the TV technicians and their equipment.

It is an open secret that both the major political parties run election campaigns just like the Reagan administration ran the invasion of Granada in 1983. Put simply, journalists accompanying the leaders are given minimal information about where they will be going and what will be announced. The story that journalists are sent a text message saying “the bus leaves at 0800 and pack for overnight” is not an urban myth. Journalists are given little time to scrutinise policy announcements, and no time to research the issue of the day. After all, rigourous scrutiny of policy is the last thing we want in an election campaign.

The purpose of such secrecy is to ensure that the key campaign event of the day is transmitted in its purest form to viewers of the nightly television news. Chasers and activists take attention away from the main message. Indeed anything, or anyone, not “on message” is to be eschewed. Anybody unpopular is warehoused for the duration of the campaign. What was Morris Iemma doing for the past six weeks; and what of Kevin Andrews and Phillip Ruddock? Both Tony Abbott’s lateness and bad language, and Jackie Kelly’s promotion of Islamophobia as a Chaser-style prank saw them become campaign pariahs.

Advertisement

Indeed, given the discipline that governs modern campaigns, it is incomprehensible that Kelly’s gang could go off on such a damaging frolic of their own, without at least some head office knowledge. Either someone in campaign management was complicit, or the Liberals had given up Lindsay as lost, and the guardhouse had been abandoned.

It’s the unscripted moments that cause heartburn for campaign managers, which is why Howard, battling from behind had to do the tough gigs with Tony Jones, Neil Mitchell, and Kerry O’Brien. Take for example this exchange between Kerry O’Brien and John Howard on November 20.

JOHN HOWARD: You learn by experience. You have to go through things to actually understand it ...

KERRY O'BRIEN: Or you can learn by a study of the past.

JOHN HOWARD: You can't learn by reading a book or uttering a mantra or uttering a focus group tested line.

KERRY O'BRIEN: We can't learn from history without being a part of it?

Advertisement

You can't learn by reading a book. A wonderful line, which, with today’s technology can be up on YouTube as an attack ad overnight. In hundreds of thousands of lounge rooms, voters who see education as the pathway to social mobility purse their lips and say “Hmmmm”.

This “campaign bus as a detention centre” model of political campaigning is why Laurie Oakes, Michael Brissenden and Paul Bongornio stay studio bound in Canberra, and rarely go on the road. They will attend the big set piece events such as the campaign launch, but that’s the limit.

On occasions the major players complained. Howard got testy at one point that the heavy hitters were not in the pack. If they weren’t, he’s only got himself to blame.

In this campaign the key objective for Labor was to get pictures - for tonight’s TV news and tomorrow’s front page - of Kevin in either a hospital or a school. Smiling. For John Howard, the objective was to get a picture of Howard hugging blokes. Hugging women and children is a no no, but hugging blokes, particularly aspirational blokes from ordinary working families, shows that Howard is not mean and tricky, and that he’s not anti-worker - in fact he likes them so much he runs around the country hugging them.

And then, almost in a class of their own, are the visits to schools where the candidate gives high fives, signs autographs, and generally attempts to generate some hysteria among 14-year-old girls. What unmasks this as a campaign stunt is the fact that school kids can’t vote, but footage of them treating pollies like pop stars always makes the nightly TV news before the first ad break.

You can measure how successful the backdrops were by the number of times they are subsequently used by the TV networks as stock footage. Probably the most widely used stock footage of the 2007 campaign was that of Rudd and Peter Garrett in the glass bottomed boat at Green Island, and the subsequent sand kicking stroll along the beach. All staged for the cameras. The fact they were accompanied by a sun bleached blonde reef guide just added value to the footage. Labor subsequently won the seat of Leichardt from whence all that footage came.

On the road, preference is usually given at the “stand ups” to answering questions from local media outlets, so that at an announcement on water policy at some dried up waterhole in regional Australia, the reporter from the local Galargombone Clarion who knows bugger all about the macro-policy settings on the issue, will get the call, instead of a Gallery reporter who at least know what the initials IPCC stand for.

Very few media organisations are willing to expose the tactics; the 7.30 Report ran a desultory piece by Heather Ewart on a slow news day out of Melbourne.

Yes as we saw with APEC, the greatest threat to the daily campaign message comes, not from the unscripted, accidental encounters on the morning walk or in the shopping mall, from old ladies stomped by the media scrum, or silly old buggers, but from the equally disciplined, scripted, well planned and executed Chaser. It might appear anarchic, but it’s not. It is said that the war on terror never ends; let’s hope the same applies to the War on Everything because this is one battle Oakes and O’Brien, Brissenden and Bongornio are not willing fight in public.

Finally, by way of a footnote. The media organisations have to band together to take the election debates out of the hands of the parties, and out of that suburban drinking hole and gambling den that calls itself the National Press Club.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

4 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr John Harrison teaches journalism and communication at The University of Queensland. An award winning journalist and higher education teacher, he is at the forefront of the development of new ways of learning using digital mobile media.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Harrison

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Harrison
Article Tools
Comment 4 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy