Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

A headlong rush to riches and unhappiness

By Richard Eckersley - posted Monday, 21 November 2005


Wellbeing comes from being connected and engaged, from being suspended in a web of relationships and interests, which give meaning to our lives. The intimacy, belonging and support provided by close personal relationships seem to matter most; isolation exacts the highest price.

Money and what it buys constitute only a part of what makes for a high quality of life. And the pursuit of wealth can exact a high cost when it is given too high a priority - nationally or personally - and so crowds out other, more important goals. The need to belong is more important than the need to be rich; meaning matters more than money.

Policies that make our working lives longer, harder or more insecure, and so increase pressures on families and other relationships, will diminish our wellbeing, however richer they make us.

Advertisement

Our politics is lagging far behind both scientific evidence and public opinion on what makes life worth living - a dangerous development for democracy.

When political leaders claim a strong, dynamic and growing economy is the overriding responsibility of government, and bend all else to this objective, we might ask them this: the bottom line of growing the economy at 3-4 per cent a year is that we will be, on average and in real terms, earning and consuming twice as much in 20-30 years as we are now. Should this really be our top priority as a nation?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Canberra Times on October 25, 2005.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Richard Eckersley is an independent researcher. His work explores progress and wellbeing.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Richard Eckersley

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Richard Eckersley
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy