Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Economic philosophy in Australia

By Ben Rees - posted Tuesday, 23 September 2025


2. Long term performance Australian economy 1971-2025

Chart 1

Compiled from RBA Statistical Tables online

Advertisement

From Chart 1, the long-term trend line identifies long-term declining performance of the Australian economy between 1961 and 2025. Long-term economic decline can be explained only by structural change driven by political and economic philosophies of the various administrations.

Between 1961 and 2025, the Australian population, or domestic market, grew from10.5 million to 27.5 million or 162%. Whilst official unemployment data is not available for 1961, data from 1966 to 1970 is available in The Australian Year Book, 1971. Unemployment in Australia averaged 1.16% between 1966 and 1970 whilst the CPI averaged 2.23% between 1961-1969. Compare these figures with the basis of contemporary RBA applied monetarism that assumes NAIRU to be 4.6% with CPI measured inflation sitting between a 2%-3% range.

Another interesting impact upon Australian GDP performance is "climate change" policy that results from ratifying the Kyoto Protocol in 2007 and again committing to the second phase in 2012. From Chart 1, both the rate of change in GDP and real household disposable income slow down beyond these two points on respective curves. The percentage change in real household disposable income could easily constitute a trend line through the percentage change in GDP.

Change in a sectoral percentage represents structural change in an economy. In 1961, household consumption as a percentage of GDP was 58.9%, but remained relatively stable at 58.1% in 2001. In July 2000, the existing wholesale sales tax system was replaced with the GST. From 2001 onwards the household consumption curve begins a downwards slope from 58.1 to 48.7% of GDP post Covid in 2022. Some recovery occurs by 2024 as household consumption reaches 51% of GDP. Nevertheless, the contraction in household consumption from 2001 to 2022 represents a 16.18 % change in sectoral composition of the economy. The recovery to 51% in 2024 softens the sectoral change somewhat to 12.2 %

The important determinant of consumption expenditure is compensation of employees. From a peak of 57.5% in 1975, compensation of employees falls to 45.06% in 2024. That is a redistribution from employees to the wider economy of 21.6%. This redistribution of compensation of employees to other sectors of the economy renders the contemporary argument of productivity little more than an ideological slogan. The contraction of compensation of employees is consistent with the sectoral change in household consumption percentage of GDP

Changes in sectoral contributions to GDP have been from employees and households to other sectors: business, government, and net exports.

Advertisement

3. Economic growth and investment

"The underlying growth rate of the economy is determined by the rate of investment" " Paul Ormerod

Chart 2

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Ben Rees is both a farmer and a research economist. He has been a contributor to QUT research projects such as Rebuilding Rural Australia. Over the years he has been keynote and guest speaker at national and local rural meetings and conferences. Ben also participated in a 2004 Monash Farm Forum.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Ben Rees

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Ben Rees
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy