How can the resistance ever counter, Copacabana Albanese's 1.5m migrants?

Stakeholder insurgency?

The logic goes, if stakeholders flipped, then Huge Australia would be untenable.

But the great majority of selfish stakeholders endorses the program, at any cost. Pushing back is a telephone-box of entrepreneurs, economists, media, academics, lobby groups.

It seems improbable, the stakeholder majority would flip. They have little concept, that voter wellbeing should come first.

Environmental disasters?

In case schoolkids miss the point, Australia's post-1788 environmental policy drives the national anthem. Imagining a "boundless" land of "golden" soils.

Topping Treasury's 40 million, Kevin Rudd wants 50. As do urban "planners". Water "planners" surrendered long ago.

Australia overcame COVID virus - but offered no resistance to Net Zero virus.

Far from addressing Australia's chronic environmental decline, Net Zero leapfrogs it.

We'll "science the shit" out of it, gushes CSIRO's Mission Lead. "Nature Positive and Net Zero", fibs Albanese's captured Environment Secretary.

With UN evangelism corrupting Australian science, there's even less hope, escalating environmental setbacks could quench Huge Australia.

Exceptional leaders?

One third of Perth stepped out, for John Curtin's 1945 funeral. Would today's Perth show that kind of respect, for an Albanese? The punchlines write themselves, don't they.

No 20th century Australia PM would've (could've) signed Albanese's treasonous immigration compacts with sectarian (BJP) India.

Putting Australians first has become a politician's joke. Party preselection prefers smug globalists and careerists.