Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Queensland’s Truth Telling Commission breaches Westminster and election conventions

By Scott Prasser - posted Friday, 25 October 2024


Recently, the chair of Queensland's government's Truth Telling and Healing Commission was reported in the media for publicly attacking the leader of the Liberal National Party and opposition, David Crisafulli, for his party's stated policy to close down the commission if elected at this week's election.

The Truth Telling Commission is a special commission of inquiry that was appointed by the present Queensland Labor government to report on the impact of European settlement and 'colonisation' on Aboriginal peoples in this state.

It was established under legislation similar for the appointment of royal commissions, but 'customised to facilitate the participation of Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islander peoples by adopting a culturally appropriate and non-legalistic approach.'

Advertisement

So, in all respects it is like a royal commission inquiry so the first issue is whether the chair of such a body should be making any public comments that could be construed as being political or partisan.

While the investigatory powers of commissions are governed by legislation how their chairs behave during and after an inquiry is very much determined in Westminster democracies like Queensland's by accepted conventions of what is regarded as appropriate behaviour by officials and elected members.

Because such commissions are appointed to investigate some perceived wrong-doing, scandal or controversial issue, it is essential they be seen as being independent and not partisan.

While such commissions should be energetic in their pursuit of the 'truth' in their inquiry and public hearings, it is important they neither appear to be biased in how they conduct their investigations nor in any public comments their members might make.

They must keep the political fray at arm's length otherwise they are a diminished tool of investigation.

Remember two previous Queensland commissions – the Connolly-Ryan inquiry into the Criminal Justice Commission appointed by the Borbidge coalition government and the first Bundaberg Hospital Commission of Inquiry established by the Beattie Labor administration – were both closed down when the Supreme Court found they had exhibited what is called 'apprehended bias' or perceived bias in their processes thus prejudicing the independence of their investigations.

Advertisement

The bias in those two cases related to the issues under investigation were not politically targets, but the principle is the same – commissions of inquiry must be independent.

Similarly, when Dyson Heydon who chaired the Abbott government's royal commission into trade union governance was due to speak at a Liberal party function there was a huge outcry about him showing partiality. It tainted the commission's findings.

The Truth Commission's public criticism of the current LNP opposition could therefore be construed of indulging in inappropriate political and partisan comment and thus showing a perceived 'bias' in the conduct of its inquiry.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published on Policy Insights.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Scott Prasser has worked on senior policy and research roles in federal and state governments. His recent publications include:Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia (2021); The Whitlam Era with David Clune (2022), the edited New directions in royal commission and public inquiries: Do we need them? and The Art of Opposition (2024)reviewing oppositions across Australia and internationally.


Other articles by this Author

All articles by Scott Prasser

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Scott Prasser
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy