Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why facts (voters) can’t get a look-in against ‘Huge Australia’ groupthink

By Stephen Saunders - posted Thursday, 21 March 2024


Media is compromised. The federal press gallery and the National Press Club (NPC) tend to repeat government's line and lob marshmallow questions. They love their advance drops.

Migration martinet Katharine Murphy parachuted from the Guardian into the prime minister's office. NPC President and ABC Board Member, Laura Tingle, has always been an immigration partisan.

Outfits like News Corp, Nine, ABC/SBS, Ten, Seven, Guardian, and The Conversation, normalise Huge Australia. Some (News Corp/Nine again, Canberra Times, Sky, Daily Mail) also cover the negatives.

Advertisement

Good for News Corp, and Nine. Means little, unless paramount chiefs Lachlan Murdoch, and Peter Costello put the screws on Huge Australia. Wait on - Costello as Treasurer started it.

Universities and unions are meant to serve our students and workers. Now Huge Australia comes first, especially overseas students. In the 1980s, even 1990s, professions and trades would have queried those Modi agreements. Not now – that might be racist.

UN climate policy has hijacked our population policy. Taking UN "net zero emissions" as gospel, our university herd recommends (convoluted) climate mitigation not (easy) population mitigation. Even though unchecked population growth greatly increases our ecological footprint.

Climate not population policy motivates think tanks and interest groups. TAPRI and SPA push back.

Some think tanks (CEDA , CIS , Grattan ) are growth lobbyists. Others (Academy of Science, ACF, Australia Institute ) have strategically ditched the population issue. Greens caved first, in 1998.

Low migration? That would be racist. Climate/green/housing/women's/religious lobbies are virtually (virtuously) obliged to reject it. Tough luck, for equality and opportunity .

Advertisement

These backflips indicate the 21st century dominanceof the identity-based left-liberal culture of wokeness. Identity measures (and politics) replace equality measures (and politics).

How to counter stakeholders?

The disastrous Albanese legacy will be 250,000 minimum as the Treasury "normal" or floor for net migration, four to five times our 20th century average.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy