Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Why facts (voters) can’t get a look-in against ‘Huge Australia’ groupthink

By Stephen Saunders - posted Thursday, 21 March 2024


Electors and environment have never been worse served by Huge Australia. Yet it's all-powerful. This poses historic challenges for voter-friendly voices. Evidence bounces off the stakeholder mafia.

As an experiment, I skimmed the "cream" from the summit list. Then added in essential stakeholders, particularly federal agencies, and mainstream media.

This yielded eight stakeholder groups and 100-plus agencies/individuals including 40 Summiteers. It was hard to find a dozen notable agencies challenging the Huge Australia narrative. None attended the summit. The groupthink is less stifling in the US and certain EU nations where low-migration parties can turn or win elections.

Advertisement

Despite five major blocs in our federal politics - Liberal, Labor, National, Greens, Teal – voters have no low-migration option. The time-stained Liberal-Labor duopoly locks them out.

Federal Agencies are notable propagandists for Huge Australia. In Treasury portfolio, Home Affairs/Environment, ABC/SBS, ANU/CSIRO.

Treasury, Reserve Bank, Productivity Commission mandarins enjoy lush salaries, for un-seeing the massive migration. Treasurer's fatwa denies Huge Australia is any drag on productivity.

The federal budget absorbs GDP benefits of migration, while states and cities absorb costs. Yet states adore their Huge Australia debts – Victoria almost unto bankruptcy.

States are reliant on Commonwealth grants, also captured by industry and developers who dominated the summit. More population = bigger business + flatter wages.

In their spare time, corporates like Atlassian and Fortescue "save the planet". No mention of population.

Advertisement

Economists, urban planners, and demographers are well-paid soothsayers of Huge Australia. "Better planning" is their default prescription.

A couple of (actually) independent economists query endless population growth.

While guru Ross Garnaut bemoans Australia's "lost decade" for productivity and wages. Never mind the mega migration, we can leapfrog to being an "energy superpower" with "zero carbon" exports. Music to the treasurer's ears.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

15 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 15 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy