Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Death taxes are no way to deal with intergenerational inequality

By Graham Young - posted Friday, 22 September 2023


(Thomas Piketty wrote "Capital in the Twenty-First Century," which posited a world where the rich would ultimately accumulate all the capital in the world because the rate of return on assets is higher than growth. It has striking similarities to Thomas Malthus' discredited work on population growth.)

With this mindset, it's easy to see why she would want to tax inheritances and redistribute the wealth to lower taxes. Except most of the extra taxes generated would go to pay for the elderly, who are the ones driving the increase in health and age expenditure.

It wouldn't make it any easier to buy a house for a young person tomorrow than it is today (although it would make some young people who wouldn't inherit as much, more miserable).

Advertisement

Wouldn't it just make more sense to make older Australians responsible for more of their aged care?

Apart from the fact that her death duties proposal would be massively unpopular and join the other 98 recommendations of the PC from the last six years that have been ignored, if it were implemented it would do considerable damage.

Here's the challenge with an inheritance tax

An inheritance is a gift and not dissimilar to winnings in a lottery. You couldn't tax one without taxing the other, and not just winnings from games of chance. Any gift would have to be taxed.

But we have a general approach to these things that you only tax income-earning activities, that is activities that you deliberately engage in to earn an income. Bookies get taxed on their winnings, punters don't.

Then there is the problem of the family farm.

This would be the biggest boost to corporate farming ever because many properties would have to be sold, and what family enterprise is going to be able to buy them when faced with the same ultimate prospect of inheritance taxes?

Advertisement

I've got nothing against corporate farming, but family farms have a place too, and can be some of the most innovative.

At the same time, it would plunge some obstinate operators into subsistence as they clung to debt-ridden properties after paying the tax.

Family businesses would face a similar problem.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This article was first published by the Epoch Times.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy