Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Death taxes are no way to deal with intergenerational inequality

By Graham Young - posted Friday, 22 September 2023


Ms. Wood seems to be cut from a similar soft-left cloth. Under her leadership, Grattan has continued to make soothing misleading noises about the energy transition, and while it was influential during the COVID crisis its advice was mostly wrong.

In her Giblin Lecture, delivered in Hobart two weeks ago, she gives us some ideas about what she will push.

The lecture is entitled "Creating a better Australia for Generation Next."

Advertisement

As intergenerational equity is one of the concerns of the Productivity Commission, so far, so good.

A section of the Queensland Alumina Refinery in Gladstone, Queensland, Australia, on Jan. 18, 2012. The Refinery which opened in 1967 is one of the largest by Alumina production in the world. (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

A list of bad ideas

Ms. Wood quickly got herself into hot water with a number of her prescriptions.

She wants to reintroduce death duties; tax retirees at higher rates, including their superannuation earnings; abolish dividend franking; reduce the capital gains discount; and tighten the assets test on the pension.

I'm sure her motivations are good but with one exception, which I won't outline here, these are all terrible ideas and don't address the underlying problems, which she analyses in some depth.

She points to the fact that increased interest rates disproportionately affect young people and that their living standards, compared to older Australians, have declined.

Advertisement

Housing affordability is in crisis, and the ability to buy a first home, absent a rich benefactor to help with the deposit, has never been worse.

In addition, government costs, particularly in aging and health are increasing faster than economic growth, and so consuming more and more of tax revenues, which are increasingly paid by the young and not the old.

This leads her to some Pikettian Hell where eventually all the assets of the world will be owned by a concentrated gerontocracy, freezing the young and unconnected out of a secure life and home ownership forever.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. All

This article was first published by the Epoch Times.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy