Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

This 'Jobs and Skills' Summit is sending us straight back onto the Big Australia hamster wheel

By Stephen Saunders - posted Thursday, 1 September 2022


SPA offers the standard retort, that every single migrant incurs a fresh $100,000 in infrastructure needs. Largely shouldered by state-local governments, and not considered in the federal Budget as it ought to be.

Remember, the economy well survived Morrison's locked border. Australians enjoyed bumper employment, if not wage rises.

So, before we rev up the hamster wheel once again, how about we "address barriers to Australians undertaking and completing training" or "finding entry-level jobs"? For SPA and others, continually "importing nurses and teachers" is no answer to lousy pay and conditions.

Advertisement

There's the rub. The Issues Paper recycles dubious promises made by John Howard and Kim Beazley back in 2005. When they first signed off on humungous immigration, under the handy cover of a mining boom.

So, this year's lame excuse, for the nth time, is that mass migration will "complement, not substitute" local training. Yeah right. We've all seen how that movie ends.

Local training remains ditched and dateless, as cut-price migration marries off to gleeful employers. Include here, the returning droves of students, with bigly expanded work rights and seeking residence.

Our reductionist Treasury, though fully responsible for our population policy, is still allowed to largely bypass the electoral and environmental considerations. So wrong.

That Treasury still welcomes raw GDP growth. Never mind if it's pumped more by population than productivity. Love that hamster wheel.

Re population, big decisions may or may not come from the Summit itself. In any event, the crux is not "permanent" migration, already near-certain to hit a new record. It's how Treasurer Chalmers plays net migration. That's the key number, when estimating population growth.

Advertisement

Over 2020-2022, then Opposition Leader Albanese said nothing in reply, as Treasurer Frydenberg's Budgets targeted net migration in the mid to high 200,000s. Following which, predictably, Liberal and Labor kept their mass migration memorandum well away from the election contest.

Albanese has no mandate, for his making sky-high immigration the No 1 policy priority. Check this motherhood in the Labor platform :

The size and composition of Australia's migration intake will take into account net overseas migration, its effects on employment and training opportunities for Australian residents…

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

22 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 22 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy