The search for open and safe platforms continues
While some decentralised platforms may claim to offer a free for all, the reality of using them shows us some level of moderation is both inevitable and necessary for even the most censorship-resistant networks. There are a host of moral and legal obligations which are unavoidable.
Traditional platforms including Twitter and Facebook rely on the moral responsibility of a central authority. At the same time, they are the target of political and social pressure.
Decentralised platforms have had to come up with more complex, and in some ways less satisfying, moderation techniques. But despite being innovative, they don't really resolve the tension between moderating those who wish to cause harm and maximising free speech.
Advertisement
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Discuss in our Forums
See what other readers are saying about this article!
Click here to read & post comments.
13 posts so far.
About the Authors
Chris Berg is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs and editor of the IPA Review.
Elizabeth Morton is a research fellow of the RMIT Blockchain Innovation Hub and a lecturer in taxation, at RMIT University
Marta Poblet is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Business and Law, RMIT University.