Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The truth about 'serious atheism'

By Graham Preston - posted Monday, 27 November 2017


In such a universe no objective morality can exist. Matter does not care what we do. Moreover we are not responsible to anyone for anything. The serious atheist who does think they are responsible to anyone for anything is just seriously mistaken.

Sellick refers to "human failings," "and "human cruelty" but again these words mean nothing if atheism is true. One cannot fail if there is no objective goal and one cannot be cruel if there is no objective moral standard.

This sounds shockingly counterintuitive but it just shows how powerful the influence of Christian/religious belief remains in our society. Let's face it, we desperately want to believe that it is true that rape and murder are actually wrong and that kindness and generosity are actually right. To think that all these behaviours are equally "good" and "bad" – that the notion of morality is essentially meaningless - is too awful to contemplate. But such is the nature of an atheistic universe.

Advertisement

Lastly and most significantly, the serious atheist should recognise that an atheistic universe would be one that is fully determined, that is, one without any free will. The laws of physics acting on physical matter would fully determine everything that a person thinks, says, and does and nothing could make it otherwise.

As atheist Sam Harris has noted, ". . . the future is set – and this includes all our future states of mind and our subsequent behaviour" (Free Will, p. 29) and, "The next choice you make will come out of the darkness of prior causes that you, the conscious witness of your experience did not bring into being" (ibid. p. 34).".

Should this be true then it must be conceded at this point that all rational, meaningful interaction is impossible and always has been. The fact that we feel like we genuinely interact with each other must be nothing more than an extraordinary illusion. Hmmm.

Sellick generously states, "Atheists are to be admired for their commitment to truth and their refusal of superstition, sentimentality and the wishful thinking that cannot cope with the stark realities of life."

Well, if atheism is true then the stark reality is that life and morality are both objectively meaningless. If serious atheists are as committed to the truth and opposed to wishful thinking as Sellick thinks, then, as grim as the truth may be, let's hear them spell this out clearly.

But I forget, if everything is fully determined by the laws of physics acting on matter then we have no influence over how we feel about things or what we do about them anyway.

Advertisement

Serious atheism, if true, means that we live in a world that is actually nothing like what we think we know or experience.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

49 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Preston is an illustrator and a student of life.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Preston

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 49 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy