Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Compromise in East China Sea a test of leadership

By Julie Bishop - posted Thursday, 20 December 2012


Another issue fraught with difficulty is resolving territorial disputes with China, South Korea and Russia.

The most pressing of these is the dispute over the island group named by the Japanese as the Senkakus and by the Chinese as the Diaoyus.

Prime Minister Abe said during the recent election campaign that Japan would not concede “one millimetre” of its territory to China.

Advertisement

While China’s new leader Xi Jinping has not responded directly, China has increased its presence near the uninhabited islands and recently flew a government aircraft overhead.

Japan responded by scrambling F-15 fighter jets.

This dispute represents a serious flashpoint and there is a high risk of miscalculation.

During my recent visits to Japan and China I have been struck by the militant rhetoric of officials in both countries in our discussions about the islands.

Both Japan and China are deadly serious about their respective territorial claims and neither appears prepared to compromise.

Much more is at stake than the oft-presumed motivation of gaining access to the seabed for energy and resources exploration.

Advertisement

The dispute is patently a matter of national pride for both countries, and is steeped in the complex history of an ancient rivalry.

China’s increasing military might has clearly unsettled large sections of Japanese society, and seems to many in Japan reason enough to pave the way for changes to the pacifist Constitution adopted in the wake of World War II.

Mr Abe has already signalled that he intends to pursue changes to s.9 of the Constitution which restricts the ability of Japan to deploy its armed forces.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

16 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julie Bishop is the Federal Member for Curtin, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julie Bishop

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julie Bishop
Article Tools
Comment 16 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy