Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Is this a real Labor Budget?

By Tristan Ewins - posted Monday, 16 May 2011


Harsh 'Work for the Dole' provisions could actually spur public sympathy for the reform of Newstart. The best could be made of a bad situation, by tying these provisions to significant across-the-board increases in the Newstart pension, (perhaps $50 a week), and significantly greater increases for those directly involved in the program. Its severity could also be diluted with time; with more 'carrots' and less 'sticks.' The Greens should demand such a compromise through the negotiation process.

It is also crucial for Labor to drop its commitment to restrain proportionate growth in public expenditure 'no matter what.' An NDIS must deliver significant NEW funds into the system. And in addition to existing shortfalls for services, welfare and infrastructure, sooner or later Labor must address in a progressive manner the pressures of an ageing population and a growing population.

Tens of billions are needed for aged care, health, medium-high density social housing and transport infrastructure. This expansion cannot go on forever, but a reasonable goal for the time being would be to increase the tax base progressively by 1.5% of the GDP per term. Specifically, Labor should consider the restructure of income tax or dividend imputation, a wealth tax, or a National Disability Insurance Scheme - or a mix of these options. Moreover, following a broader restructure and indexation of the bottom two income tax brackets, Labor could also let bracket creep 'do some of the work.'

Advertisement

Only by meaningfully grappling with these issues can Labor overcome the impression of indecisiveness; reclaiming its status as a real electoral contender, as a government of vision, social conscience and active social and economic reform.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

14 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Tristan Ewins has a PhD and is a freelance writer, qualified teacher and social commentator based in Melbourne, Australia. He is also a long-time member of the Socialist Left of the Australian Labor Party (ALP). He blogs at Left Focus, ALP Socialist Left Forum and the Movement for a Democratic Mixed Economy.
.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Tristan Ewins

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Tristan Ewins
Article Tools
Comment 14 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy