Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The global warming debate - a personal perspective

By Steven Meyer - posted Wednesday, 17 November 2010


Clouds

These are the big unknown. There is no simple physics theory to guide us here as there is in the case of water vapour and albedo. Attempts to prove that clouds provide a negative feedback mechanism have all failed. What evidence there is suggests that temperature induced changes in the nature of cloud cover will result in a small net positive feedback effect.

Stratospheric water vapour

There is some evidence that the concentration of water vapour in the stratosphere declined in the past decade. No one knows why. This by itself could explain the pause in the upward movement of temperature we have observed since 2000, a pause which appears to be coming to an end.

Conclusion

Physics theory implies that adding CO2 to the atmosphere will alter climate. A reasonable inference from the available evidence indicates that this is most likely happening. Therefore there is a decision to be made.

Advertisement

Because CO2 molecules persist in the atmosphere for such a long period prudence suggests that we should start taking steps to reduce CO2 emissions. I shall not put it more strongly than that. Nor am I going to make cheery forecasts about "green jobs". Frankly this is going to be an expensive pain the backside.

It's like spending money on submarines and jet fighters. You don't do it because it's a good thing; you do it because sometimes you have to.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Page 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

79 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Steven Meyer graduated as a physicist from the University of Cape Town and has spent most of his life in banking, insurance and utilities, with two stints into academe.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Steven Meyer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 79 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy