Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The global warming debate - a personal perspective

By Steven Meyer - posted Wednesday, 17 November 2010


The earth's energy budget

For surface temperature stability the average incoming energy from all sources - which includes direct energy from the sun plus back radiation from the atmosphere - must equal outgoing energy. If incoming energy rises then, EVERYTHING ELSE BEING EQUAL, surface temperatures will rise until a new equilibrium is established at a higher temperature.

Anthropogenic global warming (AGW)

The theory is simple. Add a greenhouse gas, in this case CO2, to the atmosphere and the amount of back radiation increases. Everything else being equal this should result in a rise in average surface temperatures.

There is a simple approximation formula that can be used to calculate the extra back radiation from adding CO2 to the atmosphere:

Advertisement

Extra radiation (watts / sq. metre) = 5.35 ln(C / C0)

Where ln = natural logarithm

C0 = atmospheric CO2 level in 1750 = 280 parts per million (ppm)

C = current CO2 level = 385 ppm.

Plugging in the numbers gives additional back radiation of 1.7 watts / sq.metre. This translates into an average temperature rise at Earth surface of about 0.3 degrees Celsius. If this was the sum total of AGW there would be nothing to worry about.

What is not equal? Positive and negative feedbacks

Positive feedbacks amplify the effects of adding CO2 to the atmosphere. Negative feedbacks mitigate the effect of additional CO2.

Advertisement

Unfortunately most feedbacks that have been investigated appear to be positive. I'll confine myself to discussing four.

Water vapour

Water vapour is by far the most important greenhouse gas. Physics theory says that adding CO2 should lead to an increase in the water vapour content of the atmosphere. This appears to be happening. Additional water vapour magnifies the effects of additional CO2.

Albedo

Albedo is a measure of the amount of sunlight Earth surface reflects. The more that is reflected the less heating at Earth surface. Higher temperatures, mainly by shortening the "ice and snow" periods in the northern hemisphere, decrease the Earth's albedo leading to further rises in temperature.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

79 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Steven Meyer graduated as a physicist from the University of Cape Town and has spent most of his life in banking, insurance and utilities, with two stints into academe.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Steven Meyer

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 79 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy