Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Ground control to Major Rudd ...

By Julie Bishop - posted Friday, 14 May 2010


There are also numerous reports of mining companies turning their attention to Africa in terms of long-term exploration and development.

Macquarie Bank is reportedly advising its clients that Australia was "now seen as being a high sovereign risk destination to invest" and that there was a "significant risk of major capital flight out of Australia".

The Wall Street Journal, in its scathing assessment of Mr Rudd’s super tax, put it succinctly in its editorial, “This economic thinking runs counter to everything that made Australia rich over the last three decades: namely, the embrace of competition and capitalism, which rewards high risk with high returns. … The truth is that all windfall taxes, however they are dressed up and sold by politicians, are arbitrary and economically damaging.”

Advertisement

The Rudd political spin machine also whipped up the old ideological class warfare rhetoric with the Prime Minister portraying mining companies as rapacious foreigners who take away the resources owned by Australians and fail to pay their way while sending profits offshore.

However, Xstrata, for example, pointed out that since it commenced operations in 2002, it had invested $45 billion in Australia exceeding the $44 billion it had earned.

As the CEO Mick Davis said: “And we were planning to continue to invest more in Australia than our operations would have generated. The proposed tax will significantly impair the cash flows available to sustain our operations and has introduced great investment uncertainty.”

Wealth redistribution rather than wealth creation is the Labor way.

The government has indicated that it will “consult” with the mining sector over the design of the super tax, but as Labor heavy weight Graeme Richardson wrote in his book “Whatever it Takes” , standard Labor practice is to consult, consult and consult and then do exactly what it intended in the first place.

The mining companies should not expect any concessions.

Advertisement

The government has already spent the $9 billion per annum it expects to raise from the super tax.

Given his logic that the tax is “good” for the miners, Mr Rudd must be deeply confused as to why no other sector is lining up for an additional 40 per cent tax slug to underpin their future growth.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The National Times on May 12, 2010.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

35 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Julie Bishop is the Federal Member for Curtin, Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Julie Bishop

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Julie Bishop
Article Tools
Comment 35 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy