Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The low-interest road to ruin

By Saul Eslake - posted Wednesday, 23 September 2009


There's little doubt that without these measures, more Australians would have taken out mortgages that they would have eventually been unable to service; there would have been more mortgage defaults and more forced sales, putting more downward pressure on house prices; and banks and other mortgage lenders would have incurred bigger losses. So, a key lesson from the crisis should be that inappropriately low interest rates can be as damaging as inappropriately high ones.

And that's a lesson that needs to be borne in mind in the current debate as to when, and how, the stimulus that has been provided to cushion the impact of the financial crisis should be unwound.

In most other Western countries, where net public debt is set to approach or in many cases exceed 100 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) over the next five years, fiscal policy settings are clearly unsustainable. Those countries need to give priority, as soon as economic conditions allow, to ''fiscal consolidation'' (that is, cutting government spending and raising taxes). As a result, monetary policy will need to play a greater ongoing role in supporting economic activity; and the damage done during the financial crisis to banks' capacity to lend, and to private-sector balance sheets, will probably reduce the risk of new bubbles emerging.

Advertisement

In Australia, however, the situation is the opposite. Our fiscal policy settings are in no sense unsustainable: most other Western governments would swap their debt-to-GDP ratios for ours in an instant. However, our monetary policy settings are almost certainly not sustainable for much longer, given how much circumstances have changed from those envisaged when those settings were being established late last year and early this.

That's not to say that the Reserve Bank will, or indeed should, be lifting its cash rate at next month's board meeting, or even the one after that. But it would be ironic, and ultimately tragic, if Australia's monetary authorities were now to make the mistake that to their great credit, and Australians' great benefit, they avoided making in the years leading up to the global financial crisis.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Age on September 17, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Saul Eslake is a Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow at the University of Tasmania.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Saul Eslake

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Saul Eslake
Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy