Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Unravelling good debt

By Henry Thornton - posted Tuesday, 2 June 2009


Finally, thank the gods, a serious debate on debt and deficits has been joined. So far, the emphasis has been on government debt, the debt we mostly owe to ourselves or, more accurately, our children and our grandchildren.

This domestic debt will, as revealed in the budget debate, quickly rise to $300 billion. Of course, if the economic recovery is slower than predicted by Treasury, or weaker, this figure will be larger.

What if the world economy suffered a major relapse, a relapse that killed off the green shoots of recovery? We are told there was tightly controlled but deep concern as the cabinet faced the global credit crisis, as Lehman Brothers failed in late September and other bad news hit the screens.

Advertisement

David Uren reports: “Wayne Swan conveyed something of the atmosphere in cabinet meetings at that time in his post-budget address to the National Press Club.

“Historians have written about the tension-filled atmosphere that engulfed the Scullin government in the days after the Wall Street collapse of 1929. That government was swamped by events it could neither understand nor control.

"Sitting around that cabinet table in October, and by teleconference from DC, we were determined that history would not repeat itself. We were determined to respond with immediacy, purpose and effect."

A global relapse now would make the situation far more like that faced by the Scullin cabinet.

Despite the tight control of the Rudd cabinet, with large resources to draw upon, a relapse would find Labor with “no ammo left”, as David Uren puts it.

Yet, even without a dramatic relapse, the news will get steadily worse as the year unfolds. Unemployment, already well above official estimates, will get worse, business profits and investment will fall and credit is likely to contract further.

Advertisement

Roy Morgan's fourth state of the nation report was released late last week, based on thorough polling of what is worrying Australians.

“Clearly, the global financial crisis has had a deep effect on people's own sense of perspective in these times. Over half of respondents to the survey indicated economic-related concerns as being the most important problem facing both Australia and the World today.

“These numbers have steadily increased over the past year, as just a year ago only 23 per cent of Australians nominated economic issues as being of most concern, which grew to 30 per cent by November 2008 and now sits at 51 per cent.”

And, “the sleeper is the blame and criticism that will be levelled at the ‘superannuation’ system - including the Government, for enforcing contributions to super and fund managers”.

Another issue likely to get far more airplay in the year ahead is the shocking growth of Australia's international debt. The last number Henry saw for Australia's international debt was not far shy of $700 billion, and rising. Much of this is owed by Australia's banks.

Treasury (supported by some of the economists of the Australian National University), has traditionally regarded international debt as good debt, financing Australia's development.

Sadly, however, that view is largely wrong.

Tony Makin today issues a qualified mea culpa on behalf of his former Canberra-based colleagues. (The final paragraphs of this biographical account reports the 1980s debate and policy action.)

Most of Australia's international debt has financed not productive investment, but rather a massive housing boom and consumption that is well in excess of Australia's capacity to supply. The Canberra view, that this was good debt, was severely shaken when the Lehman Brothers collapse caused interbank lending to dry up virtually overnight. The debt of the Australian banks would not have been refinanced except for the prompt loan of Australia's triple-A credit rating to these banks.

While it is an over-simplification, there is a sense in which one should add the Government's domestic debt to the total overseas debt to get an estimate of Australia's over-spending and the constraints on policy action - the “no ammo” issue.

It was the over-spending in the 1920s that made the 1930s so severe for Australia, as it was for other debtor nations.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

First published in The Australian and in Henry Thornton's blog on June 1, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Henry Thornton (1760-1815) was a banker, M.P., Philanthropist, and a leading figure in the influential group of Evangelicals that was known as the Clapham set. His column is provided by the writers at www.henrythornton.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Henry Thornton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Henry Thornton
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy