Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Labor isn't selling this time

By Graham Young - posted Tuesday, 17 March 2009


Its final appeal is: "I don't think you understand, Mr Springborg, I just can't risk you." But voters have already made up their minds that it would be hard to do worse than under Labor. The risk at this stage is looking minimal.

In contrast, the LNP ad stars a folder that opens to reveal various claims about Labor's record on waste and mismanagement, all of which have newspaper clippings, numbers and footnotes attached. Voters give this ad marks for being factual. The format isn't new, but it doesn't draw attention to itself in the way that the Labor ad does.

It also works to reinforce the LNP's criticism that Labor can't govern well, while providing support for its contention that the LNP can fund its promises out of government efficiencies.

Advertisement

There's less to analyse in the positive ads.

The main problem for Labor is that even its supporters will frequently admit that its performance hasn't matched its rhetoric. They just think that the LNP would be worse.

Other voters think that no one could do any worse. No positive ad about Labor's record is going to work.

The LNP positive ad is a bit of nothing, making assurances about the future, but with no hard facts.

It's inoffensive, and that is the best thing that it has going for it: which pretty much sums up why Springborg and the LNP are ahead at this stage.

The audience ratings of these ads explains some puzzling things about the election. One is that while Labor normally significantly outspends its opponents, it appears to be underspending in this election. There's no point running ads if nothing you can say works.

Advertisement

Can Labor save this election? Probably not, but whether it runs to win or to come a good second, there is only one viable strategy open to it.

Labor needs to run 89 separate campaigns in 89 seats, hiding the Premier, and exposing the local members as much as possible.

On the other side, Springborg needs to associate local Labor candidates as strongly as possible with their leader and their party. Many of them have strong personal votes and may be hard to shift, particularly given voters' lack of enthusiasm for the LNP.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All

First published in The Australian on March 16, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

21 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Graham Young is chief editor and the publisher of On Line Opinion. He is executive director of the Australian Institute for Progress, an Australian think tank based in Brisbane, and the publisher of On Line Opinion.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Graham Young

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Graham Young
Article Tools
Comment 21 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy