Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Defining a recession

By Saul Eslake - posted Tuesday, 27 January 2009


Similarly, it is time to stop pretending that the Budget will remain in surplus, and instead focus on the specific measures by which the budget can be used to support economic activity and employment in the short term whilst also addressing longer-term challenges.

The best possible measures are those which will simultaneously induce an immediate increase in (or prevent declines in) spending and employment, and which will also assist in meeting longer-term goals and challenges.

One-off cash grants such as those which comprised the bulk of last year’s Economic Security Strategy meet the first test but not the second.

Advertisement

Across-the-board personal or business income tax cuts don’t meet either. In the short-term, they are likely to be saved (as were the tax cuts that took effect last July); while unless part of a broader tax reform program will do little if anything to strengthen Australia’s resilience or capacity for growth.

However tax breaks which are conditional on particular types of expenditure - such as a temporary investment allowance for businesses (for example, for capital expenditures undertaken before June 30, 2011), and tax deductions (or cash grants) for household or business expenditures designed to reduce energy or water consumption - will pass both tests.

And if the recession now under way is going to be an extended one, then the usual objections to infrastructure spending (that they do little to alleviate the downturn, but instead put upward pressure on interest rates during the subsequent recovery) lose much of their relevance - especially when there are such obvious and pressing deficiencies in Australia’s infrastructure. In the current climate, increased and accelerated spending on rigorously evaluated infrastructure projects also meet both tests for good policy.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Australian Financial Review on January 23, 2009.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

5 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Saul Eslake is a Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow at the University of Tasmania.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Saul Eslake

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Saul Eslake
Article Tools
Comment 5 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy