Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Britain and the European Union - Australian constitutional implications

By David Flint - posted Thursday, 6 November 2003


When I am sometimes told by the inevitablistes that the UK may well become a republic before Australia, I reply that ‘les cochons peuvent voler’, or whatever the French say for ‘pigs may fly’. (Actually they say : ‘when chicken have teeth’ – ‘quand les poules auront les dents’).

Subject to there being no calamity – and I do not mean that in the tabloid sense, I mean something like a meteor hitting the Earth or nuclear war - the Crown will continue .The system works far too well to experiment with some vague untested replacement, and certainly not with yet another politician.

Whether we will see the subordination of the British (but not the Canadian or Australian) Crown, and the United Kingdom and its people, to the Franco-Germans and their Brussels nomenclatura will depend on the current crew of British politicians - but if they ratify the EU constitution without the clear approval of their people, I confidently predict the people will have their revenge. They may well reverse such an outrage.

Advertisement

But this will not affect Australia in the constitutional sense. History and the law teach us that a subordinate principality can exist within an empire, while the prince is simultaneously the king of a sovereign and free nation. This was the case during the reigns of George I, II, and III. In addition to being Kings of England they were also Electors (Princes) of Hanover, a part of the Holy Roman Empire which that Napoleon so cavalierly abolished. The UK was in no way an inferior entity because of this personal union.The link ended when Victoria ascended the throne - neither the German nor French law would accept the rule of a mere woman.

I am not entitled to a British or foreign passport, unlike so many of my compatriots, including, it is said, some federal MPs, notwithstanding the disqualification this attracts under our constitution. While I regret the way things seem to be going in the UK, this is a matter for the British and not for me to decide. Nevertheless, I remain confident that whatever is done, it will have no constitutional implications for Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

This article was first published in the Australians For Constitutional Monarchy e-newsletter, Hot News on 3 November 2003.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Flint is a former chairman of the Australian Press Council and the Australian Broadcasting Authority, is author of The Twilight of the Elites, and Malice in Media Land, published by Freedom Publishing. His latest monograph is Her Majesty at 80: Impeccable Service in an Indispensable Office, Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, Sydney, 2006

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Flint
Related Links
Australians for a Consitutional Monarchy
Euopean Union
The Crown
Photo of David Flint
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Australians for Constitutional Monarchy
 The formidable Fred Nile prevails: premier concedes
 Prorogue then intimidate
 The ‘Utegate’ affair and the constitution
 ETS: emissions trading scheme or energy tax swindle?
 Information and media manipulation par excellence
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy