Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Every pollie wins a prize

By Scott Prasser - posted Friday, 2 January 2009


This may pacify backbenchers, but is it good government in terms of the talent pool available?

Most importantly, this growth of executive numbers undermines the separation of powers between executive government and parliament. Independent parliamentary scrutiny of government is undermined when such a large proportion of parliament has jobs in executive government.

Some argue that as Queensland is a growth state it needs more ministers and parliamentary secretaries.

Advertisement

While between 1990 and 2007 the size of Queensland's executive government grew by 60 per cent, our population increase was 44 per cent. In Western Australia, another growth state, the comparable increase in executive government numbers was less than 10 per cent.

It would be refreshing to hear the Premier - and more particularly, the Opposition Leader - commit to reducing executive government and rationalising departmental numbers. At the most, we need 12 ministers heading a reduced number of departments.

Fewer departments could be achieved by amalgamating the existing ramshackle administrative arrangements into a more functional clustering and jettisoning activities that could be better performed by the private sector. This would reduce duplication between departments, improve service delivery, cut costs and stimulate the private sector and jobs.

These 12 ministers could be assisted by six parliamentary secretaries who would support the most important senior portfolios.

A smaller executive government would also allow premiers to be more selective in their ministerial choices and make it more competitive to be a member of executive government.

And just think of the administrative savings to be achieved with fewer government departments.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in The Courier-Mail on December 15, 2008.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

7 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Dr Scott Prasser has worked on senior policy and research roles in federal and state governments. His recent publications include:Royal Commissions and Public Inquiries in Australia (2021); The Whitlam Era with David Clune (2022) and the edited New directions in royal commission and public inquiries: Do we need them?. His forthcoming publication is The Art of Opposition reviewing oppositions across Australia and internationally. .


Other articles by this Author

All articles by Scott Prasser

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Scott Prasser
Article Tools
Comment 7 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy