Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

‘Protecting’ the Queensland economy?

By Mike Pope - posted Wednesday, 29 October 2008

The Queensland Premier tells us that her state will be more severely damaged by climate change than will others and that its effects will include:

  • deterioration and loss of coral reefs, including the Great Barrier Reef;
  • loss of buildings due to tidal surges and flooding;
  • extinction of animal species;
  • less rainfall in some areas and loss of surface water and river flows;
  • damage to and reduced yield from agriculture and fishing;
  • threat to tourism and losses for the hospitality industry; and
  • increased demand for services from a rapidly growing population.

In almost the same breath, she tells us that Queensland emits almost a third of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions. This makes Queenslanders responsible for the highest per capita emissions in the world.


Now for the good news. The Premier has proudly announced that three new coal mines will open in Queensland within the next 12 months. She has also raised the levy on coal, increasing government financial dependence on its production. Better still, she assures us there are plans to open more coal mines, ensuring that Queensland remains Australia’s premier exporter of pollution.

As expected from such a zealous leader, Anna Bligh has asked that, when the Australian government introduces an emissions trading scheme, the price of carbon should be initially set as low as possible. She also asks that this initial price remain unchanged for three years and that the worst polluters in Queensland receive special consideration when it comes to issuing free emission permits.

These measures are necessary, she claims, in order to protect the Queensland economy. How? By encouraging existing polluters to remain in Queensland and attracting new ones to become established there? On her own admission, protecting short-term economic advantage is destined to wreak severe longer-term damage to the state economy and increase Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions.

Undaunted, Premier Bligh responds to this criticism with the surprise announcement that her government will reduce Queensland emissions by as much as 30 per cent.

“How?” ask her critics.

“Simple,” replies the Premier, “Households will be asked to use less electricity. We may further increase the domestic electricity tariff to make sure they get the message.”


“What contribution will the Queensland public sector make towards reducing emissions?” ask homeowners. The Premier remains silent.

Anna Bligh ignores the fact that the public sector is often a profligate user of electricity generated from burning coal, the major source of Queensland’s burgeoning CO2 emissions. She know that public sector inefficiencies and waste can be paid for by increased taxes, reduced services, imposing higher fees and charges, or by lowering standards and accountability.

Little wonder then that she should steadfastly refuse to set annual and longer term targets for reduction of CO2 emissions by government departments, agencies and businesses. To do otherwise would expose the performance of her government to scrutiny she does not want and can ill afford.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

11 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Mike Pope trained as an economist (Cambridge and UPNG) worked as a business planner (1966-2006), prepared and maintained business plan for the Olympic Coordinating Authority 1997-2000. He is now semi-retired with an interest in ways of ameliorating and dealing with climate change.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Mike Pope

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 11 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy