Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

The Green religion

By William York - posted Wednesday, 26 March 2008


Tetzel won his advanced degrees by arguing for the doctrine of indulgences against the views of Luther. When Luther replied, the Dominican Order felt itself attacked and responded. The Pope wanted to try Luther in Rome but Frederic the Wise of Saxony insisted that Luther be tried in Germany. The Pope ordered him to appear before his legate Cardinal, Thomas Cajetan, who was a member of the Dominican Order. There was no thought of a conflict of interest there.

For Lomborg, the publication of The Skeptical Environmentalist may be seen as the equivalent of Luther’s 95 Theses. Lomborg was accused of scientific dishonesty. Environmental scientists made complaints against him to the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty, a body under Denmark's Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. The charges were that The Skeptical Environmentalist contained deliberately misleading data and flawed conclusions. On investigation the committee supported the complaints finding the following problems with Lomborg’s work:

  • fabrication of data;
  • selective discarding of unwanted results (selective citation);
  • deliberately misleading use of statistical methods;
  • distorted interpretation of conclusions;
  • plagiarism; and
  • deliberate misinterpretation of others' results.
Advertisement

But on appeal to the Ministry the findings were invalidated. Finally after some acrobatics no further action was taken. (As an interesting reversal, some of these criticisms of Lomborg have been levelled at the IPCC. The Hockey Stick temperature chart being the best known complaint.)

The parallel with the interrogation of Martin Luther is fascinating. Luther’s enemies in Germany, the Papal courts and indeed Rome misjudged Luther. They would not yield anything to him so finally the break came.

Like Rome, the IPCC has behaved with arrogance and refused to respond to many of its critics, in particular the economists. On examination its processes are not unlike the defensive position of the Church with Luther. Then and now there is a veritable maze of conflicted interests.

So there was a benefit from Papal Indulgences, the rebuilding of the Basilica of St Peter’s. When will we have our Green Reformation and what will our generation have to show for its carbon indulgences?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

19 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

William York likes to find the funny side of life. He used to write for BRW back in the late 1980's.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by William York

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 19 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy