Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

More, smaller states for Australia

By Syd Hickman - posted Wednesday, 26 September 2007

Of all the institutions that need to be reformed to cope with new realities it is state parliaments that should top the list. State governments are also highly ranked but reform of parliaments will help governmental reform.

In New South Wales this year the Legislative Assembly is planning to sit for 50 days, and the Legislative Council for 39. In six of the 12 months there will be no sitting days. Even turning up for that many days is probably excessive. Over the last five years the Parliament has considered between 108 and 141 Government bills a year. There are usually about 500 amendments to deal with. There are a few non-government bills and roughly as many Acts are repealed as are passed. A lot of this work is non-contentious, or even unnecessary, and could be dealt with quickly.

The Western Australian Parliament sits a little more frequently but most sit less often. Last year in Victoria there were only 38 sitting days, with the excuse that it was an election year. The Northern Territory Parliament plans to sit for 35 days this year.


In our six state and two territory governments we have nearly 600 MPs who must be supplied with staff, offices, equipment, cars, travel entitlements and so on.

Most of these people have nothing to do with government, do what ever they are told by their party in relation to voting on legislation, and make very little social contribution of any kind. Their sole responsibility is to get themselves re-elected, at our expense.

All states except Queensland have Upper Houses. These are a total waste of time and money. The inhabitants of these strange environments claim that they act as a brake on governments and perform a vital role in reviewing legislation. But the vast majority of state government action is administrative, not legislative, and parliaments have little control over governments’ day-to-day affairs. There is no noticeable difference between Queensland and the territories’ governmental behaviour and that of the other states that could justify the existence of Upper Houses.

In days gone by state parliaments sat from 4pm until 10 or 11pm so that people could work at their normal job and then go to parliament to be an MP for the evening. Ministers were expected to work full time, but not members. There is no reason being a state MP should not again become a part time job, with expectations of attending sittings on 40 to 50 evenings a year. States could survive quite easily with less than ten ministers, each with about 25 per cent of the staff they now have. (States are usually run by the Premier’s Office and Department anyway.)

Clearly a key current function of state parliaments is the preservation of existing political parties, which would collapse without the jobs and financial support they derive from elected MPs.

Most people who complain about these matters advocate the abolition of state governments. But that would be almost impossible constitutionally and would result in excessive centralisation or put significant administration in the hands of a chaotic system of local government. The answer is to create more states.


This can be achieved by a referendum within the states that would lose territory to the new state. For example the Hunter Valley and northern NSW could become a new state, and the ACT could take in the southern highlands to form another State, leaving Sydney with much less hinterland to worry about, by a vote of only the people in NSW. Any state needs to include at least five federal electorates.

An Australia with, something like, 12 to 15 states sounds terribly radical in these conservative and fearful times, but less than 40 years ago people were deeply concerned about the ACT getting its own parliament instead of being run by the Commonwealth.

In 1901, when the Commonwealth was founded and the six states established, there were about 1.35 million people in NSW, half a million in Queensland and well under 200,000 in Tasmania and in Western Australia. The total European population of Australia then was about half the current population of Sydney.

Fifteen state parliaments, each with one chamber of 30 members, (for a total well below the current number of state MPs) would be cheaper, much more efficient, more locally relevant and answerable, and more encouraging of citizen engagement than the current structure. Each state would have six federal senators.

And each state would have the incentive and the power to reform local government within its boundaries. Mayors, who are generally paid for that role, could automatically sit in the state parliament along with members elected in the normal manner. The fact that the Independent Clover Moore is the Mayor of Sydney and sits in the NSW State Parliament (and has been re-elected to Parliament as mayor) proves that this is possible.

More than a century ago the people of Australia made the effort to update their political institutional structure. They created a national parliament where none had previously existed and converted six British colonies into Australian states. Compared to that effort the formation of a few more states should be easy. But at that time the nation’s leaders were driving change. Now our political leaders are the most conservative and reactionary element of our community. When real change comes it will be like the breaking of a drought.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Syd Hickman has worked as a school teacher, soldier, Commonwealth and State public servant, on the staff of a Premier, as chief of Staff to a Federal Minister and leader of the Opposition, and has survived for more than a decade in the small business world.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Syd Hickman

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy