Some inconvenient facts

“Dr. Hurd C. Willard and a team of scientists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology explained in January 1976 that planet Earth is gradually headed toward another irreversible ice age, which will progressively make itself evident over the next 125 years.” - WW III : signs of the impending Battle of Armageddon by John Wesley White, 1977.

Global cooling out. Global warming in. The catastrophic predictions are rivalled only by the Book of Revelation.

Disturbingly, “saving the environment” crusades are often characterised as a battle between the “evil” forces of conservatism, and the “angelic” forces of socialism. Further, war metaphors are used to rouse the troops. The earth is always melting, or burning.

Amid all the hyped-up prophecies, however, there is reason to be concerned, and I’m not talking about melting icecaps or frozen beaches here. I’m talking about history. The record is clear: media ideologues, movie stars, and would-be presidents, are using bad history to support bad science. This is unethical. Working class jobs are on the line.

How many times, for instance, does Al Gore denounce his critics as “flat-earthers” in a year? Yes, he believes that in the so-called Dark Ages, angry Catholics trekked around Europe denouncing men of science as “globe-earthers,” no doubt.

But history paints an entirely different picture. In the Politically Incorrect Guide to Science, Tom Bethell, an Oxford graduate, points out that: “The claim that medieval scientists and theologians believed the earth is flat was concocted in the nineteenth century.”

Likewise, Jeffrey Burton Russell, an emeritus professor of history at the University of California states: “In the first fifteen centuries of the Christian era [only!] five writers seemed to have denied the globe, and a few others were ambiguous and uninterested in the question.” Today’s lesson: Al Gore likes attacking dead Catholics because they can’t speak back.

For more facts, you can read Inventing the Flat Earth. Nevertheless, there are no primary sources to support Gore’s spin that there was a huge war between “flat-earthers” and “globe-earthers”.

While I’m at it, what is it with these scaremongers and their obsession with reinventing histories? But there’s hope. I contend that a basic understanding of history will enrich students of science, and protect us all from alarmists.

Here’s another example of how history can correct misinformation. In The Politically Incorrect Correct Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism, Christopher C. Horner states: “One key alarmist tactic is to redefine the word ‘Arctic’.”

For example: “The Artic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA), which has served as the basis for serial, breathless stories about a melting Arctic in recent years chose to expand the Arctic Circle by 450 miles in all directions.” Curiously, they didn’t advertise their new maps as well as their new temperature readings.

Naturally, a student of history will not be surprised to learn that when one expands traditional boundaries - by about 50 per cent in this case - one can colour temperature readings.

Imagine for argument’s sake if I told you that Melbourne was getting hotter, but forgot to mention that I expanded the city’s borders to encompass, say, Mildura.

Colouring temperature readings is an old trick. Still, no account of bad history supporting bad science is complete without reference to Leonardo Di Caprio’s green sermons. But to summarise: Bush is a meat-eating, rainforest rapist.

The former Santa Barbara soap star turned Titanic heartthrob, asserts in one of his stirring fan site essays that: “The alarm bells are ringing across the globe (e.g., the melting Arctic, parts of Antarctica breaking off, the disappearing glacier on top of Mt Kilimanjaro, etc.).” Also, Bush kills pretty flowers.

So, the glacier on top of Mount Kilimanjaro is disappearing because of global warming? History begs to differ.

In the International Journal of Climatology, 2004, for example, G. Kaser asserts: “Retreat from a maximum extent of Kilimanjaro’s glaciers started shortly before Hans Meyer and Ludwig Purtscheller visited the summit for the first time in 1889,” and this was “caused by an abrupt climate change to markedly drier conditions around 1880”.

In addition to pointing to inconvenient historical facts and observations (made during two fieldwork trips to Kilimanjaro), Kaser’s findings can’t be overruled by know-nothing movie stars. “Positive air temperatures, have not contributed to the recession process on the mountain so far,” maintains the scientist.

More than ever before, crusading actors are manipulating histories. I could go on. And, in addition to using bad history to support bad science, they do not care for fieldtrips.

From Pieter “illustrator of nature” Brueghel’s Hunter’s of the Snow painting (February, 1565), to extreme weather periods cited in the ancient Torah, or the Christians’ Old Testament, history, after all, is replete with examples of harsher conditions.

I would encourage all free minds to not only challenge the global warming industry, but to see this as an opportunity to stand up for history. In some ways, we’re mere ants in this unfolding picture called Life. Weather is weather. Acting is acting. And, falsifying temperature readings is a dirty scam concocted by fat cat, eco-socialists.