Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Traditional Humanities out: Creative Industries in

By Gary Ianziti - posted Thursday, 10 May 2007

Vice-Chancellor Peter Coaldrake recently announced plans to shut down QUT’s School of Humanities and Human Services. The plan would include the termination of the Bachelor of Arts and Bachelor of Social Science degrees. Staff in selected areas (Human Services, Languages) would be re-deployed. Those in the core humanities disciplines (for example, History, Geography, Politics, and Sociology) face an uncertain future.

The Coaldrake initiative has far-reaching consequences. QUT would become the first major metropolitan university in Australia to have no Bachelor of Arts degree.

The vice-chancellor defends this move by arguing that QUT has developed an alternative to what he calls “traditional” arts study. He is referring to QUT’s Faculty of Creative Industries, which began operations in 2001. The Coaldrake vision is for Creative Industries to become QUT’s version of a 21st century arts faculty.


The shutting down of what the vice-chancellor likes to call the “old” humanities will presumably be accompanied by a re-directing of resources and load towards the “new” humanities, i.e. Creative Industries.

This is a decision dictated by strategic management theory, and is meant to place QUT in a winning market position. It also implements the diversified system model for Australian universities. The plan would deliver ownership of the so-called “traditional” arts to the University of Queensland, while Creative Industries would offer QUT’s own distinctive brand of arts study.

The Coaldrake proposal is clearly grounded in firm policy settings. But it is also open to question on several key issues.

The first point is the labelling exercise that accompanies most of the media statements released by the Chancery. The labels “old” and “new” humanities are leftovers from the culture wars of the past decade. They have no real validity outside the framework of polemics long since dead and buried.

When one scrutinises what the vice-chancellor means by “traditional” humanities, it turns out he is referring to the basic humanities disciplines: History, Geography, and the like. These are the very same areas of study that are currently being talked up by both sides of politics as fundamental to Australia’s future.

Make no mistake. When the vice-chancellor threatens to axe the “traditional” humanities, he is really talking about eliminating the very same disciplines that are presently at the very forefront of educational concerns in this country.


A second point relates to the vice-chancellor’s claim that Creative Industries can step in to act as a credible replacement for an arts faculty.

Let me stress here that I have been an admirer of the Creative Industries idea from the beginning. Years ago I participated in the initial discussions that helped give shape to the concept. I have subsequently collaborated with CI colleagues on a number of research projects, in cultural studies, and more recently in journalism and media studies. I frequently run seminars and workshops for journalism students, and enjoy excellent relations with CI staff. I admire and respect their work.

To me Creative Industries is QUT at its best: responding to market forces with aggressive, innovative, and exciting applications, especially (but not only) in the technology area.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

46 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Gary Ianziti is (at the moment) still teaching history and historiography at QUT.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 46 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy