Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Hicks sees a new dawn

By Edwina MacDonald and George Williams - posted Thursday, 29 March 2007


This happened once before, in 2006, when the Supreme Court ruled the tribunals were illegal under United States law and the Geneva Conventions.

It could well happen again, and if Hicks has already been transferred to Australia, the result will be a legal mess.

The doubt cast over Hicks' plea undermines what in other circumstances would have been a triumph for the Bush Administration. It also brings into question larger issues about the strategies that are being used against terrorism.

Advertisement

Over the past five years, Guantanamo Bay and the detention of combatants such as Hicks has been an unwanted diversion. It has set back the fight against terrorism. Whatever the merits of detaining people like Hicks, the resulting furious debate has been counterproductive. It has tarnished the moral authority of nations such as the United States and Australia.

This self-inflicted wound has had a real impact on our ability to fight terrorism. Winning involves effective intelligence and policing work, and practical measures such as better security at our airports and ports. However, these are not enough. The confrontation between nations such as the US and groups such as al-Qaida must also be won at the level of ideas.

Western countries such as Australia must reject terrorism while retaining the high moral ground. If we do not, we risk motivating people to take up arms against us.

As Britain found with their bombings in July 2005, the actions of Western governments can isolate and ostracise members of their own community. This does not make those people right, but that is not the point.

We need to play smart by anticipating that failures of leadership, such as in places like the Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib prisons, can turn people from assisting the authorities into becoming susceptible to terrorist recruitment.

This is what terrorists aim for. They cannot win by military might, and instead sow fear in the hope that governments will overreact. When governments do so, they weaken the ties that bind the community and undermine social cohesion.

Advertisement

With this stage of the Hicks saga coming to an end, we need some answers. How is that the US and Australia have turned someone who received terrorist training and enlisted with the Taliban into a popular hero? How did the straightforward prosecution of an enemy combatant turn into such a political and public relations disaster?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

First published in the Herald Sun on March 28, 2007.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

33 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Authors

Edwina MacDonald is based at the Gilbert and Tobin Centre of Public Law, UNSW.

George Williams is the Anthony Mason Professor of law and Foundation Director of the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law at the University of New South Wales.

Other articles by these Authors

All articles by Edwina MacDonald
All articles by George Williams

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 33 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy