Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Prohibition v minimising harm

By Andrew Macintosh - posted Tuesday, 27 March 2007


The House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs has also launched another drug-related inquiry, seemingly to counter the recommendations made by the PJC. And in its recent hearings, the chair of the Committee, Bronwyn Bishop, attacked representatives from the Department of Health for publishing documents containing harm minimisation messages, saying “this document is full of harm minimisation. The Prime Minister said that he is opposed to harm minimisation and that we do not have it”.

She also reprimanded the ABC for using phrases like recreational drugs, party drugs and harm reduction - all common phrases among drug professionals. Professor Margaret Hamilton, a respected drug expert with over 30 years experience in the field, received a particularly harsh broadside for also using this type of terminology, as well as for making the sensible observation that moral considerations have historically played too great a role in drug debates.

Bishop is on a mission to ensure the government’s drug prevention programs are sensationalised, going as far as calling for a campaign based around the message that “this is going to scramble your brains”.

Advertisement

In this climate, the government’s drug policy is unlikely to change markedly in response to the PJC’s recommendations. Yet the members of the PJC have signalled that there are now politicians from across the political spectrum who are prepared to listen and act on the evidence.

Hopefully there will come a time when enough politicians recognise that drug use disorders are a health problem that cannot be solved by harsh drug laws or sensationalised advertising.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

40 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Andrew Macintosh is Deputy Director of The Australia Institute, a Canberra-based think tank, and author of Drug Law Reform: Beyond Prohibition.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Andrew Macintosh

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 40 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy