Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

David Hicks is luckier than some

By David Flint - posted Friday, 2 February 2007


President Clinton is said to regret, as his worst decision, not arresting bin Laden on a flight to Afghanistan. He did this on FBI advice that the charges would not stand up in a US court only because the evidence would have been inadmissible.

That such evidence can be considered by a military commission is neither unusual nor outrageous. This sort of evidence can be considered here by a Royal Commission or in a coronial inquest, and, incidentally, in criminal trials from Paris to Tokyo. And just because evidence is admitted, this does not mean it will be decisive. The commission will weigh its value. For those who predictably say they will all be US officers, pray tell, just what is Major Mori?

If he wishes to be home soon, Hicks would be well advised, once he sees the new charges, to try to negotiate a plea bargain. In return for a plea of guilty he would seek a reduced sentence with the period of his detention taken into account. It could make his stay in an Australian prison very short.

Advertisement

He may try to have the Americans agree not to make public any of the evidence against him. This would be against the public interest - Australians are entitled to know what he was doing in Afghanistan. And Hicks will probably tell his own story - for a profit. (If he does he should have to refund the vast sums the taxpayer has spent on him.)

The Americans would be well advised to require he agree not to test the legality of any imprisonment served here through a habeas corpus application. The reduction of a higher sentence could be conditional on this. (If he breached this and were successful, he would be well advised to rule out any international travel.)

What is most unfortunate about this case is the vilification of our close ally and the use of untruths and the suppression of fact to achieve that. The United States is not perfect, but among the powers that count, and have counted over the last century, there is none more generous, more respectful of the law, nor more loyal to her friends.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

90 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Flint is a former chairman of the Australian Press Council and the Australian Broadcasting Authority, is author of The Twilight of the Elites, and Malice in Media Land, published by Freedom Publishing. His latest monograph is Her Majesty at 80: Impeccable Service in an Indispensable Office, Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, Sydney, 2006

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Flint

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Flint
Article Tools
Comment 90 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Australians for Constitutional Monarchy
 The formidable Fred Nile prevails: premier concedes
 Prorogue then intimidate
 The ‘Utegate’ affair and the constitution
 ETS: emissions trading scheme or energy tax swindle?
 Information and media manipulation par excellence
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy