Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Art: a sane response to terrorism and war

By Susan McDonald - posted Wednesday, 5 October 2005


After the London bombings, Tony Blair and George Bush invoked an ideological battle against the terrorists. This political response was thrown into sharp relief by the words of a London barrister, survivor of the tube attack. Asked by a reporter what he felt about the perpetrators, he declared “I pity them”. No politics there: just a very personal reaction to having witnessed himself the evil of which humans are capable.

We’ve strayed too far from the personal. That doesn’t mean that politics isn’t valid, and even Derrida doesn’t throw up his hands and walk away from it. But it does mean that politics needs a new framework, or rather a retake on an old one.

For Spender, it had to include some reference to the inner life. For him, the conflict in the 50s between East and West didn’t in itself involve a moral choice. It only became one when it was a matter for individual conscience. (That’s a far cry from the Bush admonition, “You’re either with us or against us”.)

Advertisement

He also saw a distinction between those who care about “long-term values”, and those willing to use any means for political ends - even good ends. In the mid 20th century communism and fascism both failed his test. Islamic fundamentalism is failing it today; maybe too American neo-conservatism.

The personal must inform the political. No preconceived ideas, self-evident truths or ideologies should stand in the way of justice and a sense of shared humanity. Derrida: “We must be dutiful beyond duty, we must go beyond law, tolerance, conditional hospitality, economy …” Leaders must be ready to lose face if necessary. No-one should have to die for the cause.

The pity invoked by the barrister victim wasn’t sympathy for the terrorist, but a recognition of the seriousness of the crime committed and the damage done to a fellow soul. That, rather than ideology, is a legitimate basis for political action.

We must listen to the artists, and philosophers, judges and priests (even if they just despair). The politicians have talked too much.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Julie Marlow.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

13 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Susan McDonald is a freelance writer and sub-editor.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Susan McDonald

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Susan McDonald
Article Tools
Comment 13 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy