Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Howard Government, Howard judiciary, Howard legislature

By Joe Ludwig - posted Wednesday, 29 June 2005


The underlying problem with the current method of appointment is the lack of transparency and accountability surrounding the process. A number of common law countries are taking steps towards a more transparent judicial appointment process.

In the UK, the new Constitution Reform Act creates an independent Judicial Appointments Commission and aims to bring about a new system of appointing judges avoiding political considerations and based solely on merit.

Last year, the New Zealand Government issued a consultation paper outlining a model which included a Judicial Appointments Commission comprising eight members including three lay persons, the chief justice, one other senior judge, the president of the New Zealand Law Society, the president of the Bar Association and, for appointments to the Royal High Court, the solicitor-general. The attorney-general is awaiting advice from the Ministry of Justice on further policy options.

Advertisement

In Canada, independent judicial advisory committees are established in each province and territory to assess the qualifications of prospective applicants. The Canadian attorney-general welcomes feedback from groups in the community.

Whether Howard Government attorneys-general believe it or not, the intrinsic role of the first law officer is to continually assess the state of our courts; this includes taking the necessary steps to prevent erosion of their authority and to cultivate respect for the judiciary in our community.

It does not necessarily mean completely removing the party in power from the process, or implementing changes which would politicise the court like the grillings we see in Senate confirmation hearings in the US. Instead, we need to look ahead to the challenges that the High Court faces and to find ways of ensuring that appointments are sound and public confidence in its decisions is maintained.

If our High Court judges are going to be increasingly subjected to political attack - either from the media or by political leaders - ensuring that they are seen to be appointed on merit alone may go some way to insulating them from any loss of respect and authority.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

Article edited by Tanvi Mehta.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

6 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Joe Ludwig is the Shadow Minister for Justice and Customs.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Joe Ludwig

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Joe Ludwig
Article Tools
Comment 6 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy