Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Bring me your Huddled Murdochs!

By John Hartley - posted Wednesday, 27 April 2005


So how do we get to those digital natives? In his Opinion Journal piece, Mr Murdoch points to the importance of education, but only to claim that it is failing to meet the challenge, a fact that is only disguised by the performance of immigrants:

The evidence of the contributions these immigrants make to our society is all around us - especially in the critical area of education. Adam Smith (another Scotsman) knew that without a decent system of education, a modern capitalist society was committing suicide. Well, our modern public school systems simply are not producing the talent the American economy needs to compete in the future. And it often seems that it is our immigrants who are holding the whole thing up. … The point is that by almost any measure of educational excellence you choose, if you're in America you're going to find immigrants or their children at the top.

Like the US, Australia is a settler society, founded on successive waves of immigration. But is Australia up to the digital challenge?

Advertisement

The Ministerial Advisory Committee for Educational Renewal (MACER) advises Queensland’s Minister of Education Anna Bligh. In 2003 I chaired a MACER committee that was tasked to report on the professional development of teachers. The problem proved to be the same as the one identified by Murdoch eighteen months later: teachers are “digital immigrants” confronting a new generation of “digital natives”. We reported on the demographic research that the Y Generation are said to have a strong work ethic, are entrepreneurial, seek change and variety, are independent and enjoy change. They enjoy the coaching and mentoring approach to learning and are willing to take risks. They have very strong values and principles.

Apparently, the next cohort will be the Millennials (born since 1995) who, together with Generation Y, are digital natives rather than digital immigrants. They don’t think of computers as technology at all, work in teams, stay connected, are creators as well as consumers, don’t tolerate delays or incompetence among peers, and they like to learn. (Creative Workforce for a Smart State)

Is our formal education system ready for the challenge of people who are, at one and the same time, and in one and the same activities, both citizens and consumers, the hope for both freedom and the economy, the bearers of new wants and demands that digital distributed technologies can and do serve better than analogue centralised ones did? Here’s what the MACER report thought about that:

As a workforce, teachers are still organised along industrial lines, where standardised professional development has been tied to the needs of a command bureaucracy with industrial agreements and strong hierarchies. Teachers are treated as if they belong to the industrial working class of the mid 20th century. A culture of low trust and high control produces low autonomy, risk-averse, time-serving behaviour. The requirement for predictability at the system level produces top-down strategies that may not apply well to any individual situation. The system itself is driven by targets and indicators which may result in it continuing to perform well in ways that need to change. … If teachers are to participate in and serve the burgeoning needs of the future - where creativity, innovation, risk, autonomy and self-management are the “secret life” that drives economic and social development - then they need a make-over.

What progress towards these goals has Education Queensland actually made? A lot, if you follow tick-the-box (pdf file 42.8KB) logic.

But there’s still a long way to go. The problem is summed up for me in the high-control, low-risk strategy of Education Queensland’s website for school students, about which I do know something because two of my daughters go to Queensland state high schools. They can access and use Google for Web references, but when they try using Google’s “images” button it is blocked, no matter what images are sought. My daughter, for example, was looking for pictures of “cats.” This is what she saw:

Advertisement
STOP - Queensland Government (Education Queensland)

You cannot access the following Web address:
http://images.google.com.au/images?q=cats&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search

The site you requested is blocked under Education Queensland's Managed Internet Service Filtering Policy.

If you would like to view the category under which the site is blocked, please use the N2H2 URL Checker located at http://database.n2h2.com/cgi-perl/catrpt.pl.
You can:
Use your browser's Back button or enter a different Web address to continue.

Contact your school's MIS Administrator if you want to request this site be unblocked.

STOP! Education Queensland blocks Google Images: accessed October 14 2003

That was the situation in October 2003, when I was compiling the MACER Report. I made a fuss about it at MACER, and was eventually informed that the block had been lifted. But now I’m told it has been re-imposed, and at the time of writing is still there.

The idea that an entire Education system can protect itself, or its students, by denying them access to any images is frankly dumbfounding. It’s also about 500 years out of date. Didn’t we stop smashing images for fear of the effect they may have had on the populace back in the Reformation? Not just dumb, but stupid - if the idea is to dissuade horrible teenaged boys from looking at things that they shouldn’t, it won’t work. The only message sent is that the education system is literally frozen rigid with fear at the prospect of students finding things out for themselves.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

John Hartley is an ARC Federation Fellow and research director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation at QUT. He is the author and editor of many books and articles in the field of cultural, media and journalism studies, including Creative Industries (published by Blackwell, Oxford, 2005).

Other articles by this Author

All articles by John Hartley

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of John Hartley
Article Tools
Comment Comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science
 More...
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy