Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

The left-wing bias of Australia’s media elite

By David Flint - posted Friday, 1 April 2005

In the long struggle to found and maintain democracy as we know it, an understanding, or a compact, has emerged about the place of the media. In return for the considerable deference, status and freedom the media enjoy, their one great duty to the people is - as The Times long ago described it - to obtain the earliest and most correct intelligence of the time and instantly, by disclosing them, to make them the common property of the nation. In doing this there is one golden rule: while comment is free, facts are sacred.

A clear distinction must always, always, be made between the objective search for the truth, the news and opinion. In return, and with the obvious exception of the taxpayer-funded public broadcasters, the media are free to express their opinion however robust and partisan that may be.

While the media rightly demand that all other institutions in the nation be accountable, it is a supreme irony that by their very own standards Australia’s elite media are constantly found to be seriously wanting, for example in the annual surveys on trust and integrity of various professions.


When the president of an English teachers’ association, who chairs a government curriculum committee, recently editorialised that his English teachers had failed because generations of former students had re-elected John Howard, he well and truly let the cat out of the bag. This was that much of our children’s tuition has been requisitioned to promote a left-wing political agenda, even in the teaching of English.

This is only part of that same long march by the left-wing intelligentsia, the elites, through so many of the institutions of our nation. This includes much of our elite media, which remain a significant agenda setter for all the other media. David Marr, the former presenter of ABC TV’s Media Watch has decreed that if journalists do not come from a “soft-leftie kind of culture” they should “get another job”.

Accordingly, instead of objectively investigating and reporting on the great issues of the nation, the elite media now serve the public a never ending diet of partisan opinion disguised as facts based comment, often indistinguishable from the news, the items of which are regularly selected to be consistent with their agenda.

A corps of campaigning political journalists has descended into the political arena as participants who are both unelected and unaccountable, unashamedly advancing an agenda that is out of touch and alien to the overwhelming majority of Australians. To put this takeover in context, what would the reaction be if instead of a left agenda, the elite media campaigned for a far right agenda, key features of which enjoyed the support and interest of only 10 per cent of the population?

The problem is clear. What are the solutions? They are certainly not in the remedies proposed by the professional media watchers. As American media observer Steve Brill famously told one of them, rather than offering a solution, they are part of the problem. They believe that journalists must see the world through a left-wing prism, as David Marr puts it, a “soft-leftie culture”. Their targets are of two classes. The first are their very own competition, the popular alternative media - especially that derided and persecuted medium, talkback. The second are those few media proprietors who remain, whom they deride.

The problem with the Australian media is not in the robust opinions on the peoples’ forum - talkback radio - it is in the wider issue of the conversion of a once respected apprentice based trade, under firm editorial direction, into a buccaneering, uncontrollable commentariat, freer than ever before from editorial and managerial control. This malady dominates the columns of those once dignified, restrained and objective newspapers that formerly served as respected journals of record. It has also resulted in the elites requisitioning far too much of the national news and current affairs on the taxpayer-funded public broadcasting spectrum, thus demonstrating a suicidal tendency. Experience indicates that the axe, when it comes, is more likely to be wielded by a conservative Labor government.


The solution to the malady in the elite media is not in that universal palliative invariably proposed by the elites - more laws, more government regulation and even more taxpayer funding. Instead the solution, in part, is in enhancing freedom of speech through the winding back of Australia’s excessively restrictive defamation, contempt and vilification laws in return for greater responsibility. Freedom of speech does not mean, it has never meant and it was never intended to mean, freedom for greater violence, for abusive language and for gross indecency in the media. The villain in this has above all been the unelected and unaccountable US Supreme Court, which in this and other fields has unashamedly usurped for itself a legislative role.

While part of the answer here lies in more freedom from overbroad laws, in return for more responsibility, another part of the answer is already being provided via the market by readers, listeners and viewers. They are losing confidence in the elite media, relying more and more on alternatives such as talkback, tabloid and the internet. The power of the internet was well demonstrated in the US when a humble blogger exposed a fraudulent attack on the reputation of George W. Bush, which led to the downfall of Dan Rather.

The solution is in the hands, essentially, in the hands of the readers, listeners and viewers so that the elite media can again fulfil its role in our democracy.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. All

Article edited by Angus Ibbott.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

This is a summary of the speech given at the launch of Malice in Medialand, by David Flint, delivered by Tony Abbott in Sydney on March 18, 2005, and by Paul Gray in Melbourne on March 9, 2005.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

34 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

David Flint is a former chairman of the Australian Press Council and the Australian Broadcasting Authority, is author of The Twilight of the Elites, and Malice in Media Land, published by Freedom Publishing. His latest monograph is Her Majesty at 80: Impeccable Service in an Indispensable Office, Australians for Constitutional Monarchy, Sydney, 2006

Other articles by this Author

All articles by David Flint

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of David Flint
Article Tools
Comment 34 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from Australians for Constitutional Monarchy
 The formidable Fred Nile prevails: premier concedes
 Prorogue then intimidate
 The ‘Utegate’ affair and the constitution
 ETS: emissions trading scheme or energy tax swindle?
 Information and media manipulation par excellence

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy