Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble - interest rates moving up

By Henry Thornton - posted Wednesday, 2 March 2005


Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble for the RBA board and for borrowers. Yesterday's Reserve Bank board meeting was the most important since 2003. The board confronts scenarios that could discredit government policies or severely dent the Governor's reputation - and both are possible.

Governor Ian Macfarlane has ventured some distance out on a limb, advocating pre-emptive tightening to tackle inflation. Although this is far later than Henry Thornton recommended, and this lateness has produced avoidable risks for the Australian economy, we support the approach at this time.

We also support what will almost certainly be a gradual tightening, starting with the modest 25 basis point increase in cash rates under official control. Australia's households have amassed debt far too quickly, a major consequence of delayed monetary policy tightening. But inappropriate fiscal incentives to borrow are also a root cause, as Macfarlane has recently pointed out.

Advertisement

Australia's current account deficit - a measure of the gap between domestic demand and Australia's overall supply - is also too large, a fact that puts Australian monetary policy in "the hands of the market". If global investors decide that the economic prospects here are more subdued, as the inflation outlook dictates, there could be an old-fashioned current account deficit crisis, at which time the RBA would have to step in with a powerful tightening of monetary policy.

Now is not the time for heroic sharp tightening of monetary policy: Instead a cautious series of small 25-basis-point increases, with careful evaluation as the rises take effect.

Since the board's previous meeting in early February, the bank has issued a quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy built around the realisation that Australia faces capacity constraints, that costs are rising and interest rates will have to rise because of the imminent increase in inflation.

The governor has campaigned on these themes in front of the House Economics Committee whose chairman concluded, even at half-time, that the committee had failed to dissuade the governor from the path of raising interest rates. The governor himself had said the board's only discretion concerns timing.

The RBA governor went beyond his normal brief to put the need for urgent economic reforms squarely in front of the Government. The choice was stark.

It is sad but true - that in the immediate future nothing can be done to increase the supply-side of the economy. Within a few months, the supply-side could be freed up by announcing that the fiscal incentives to over-invest in real estate would be removed. But this is probably "politically impossible".

Advertisement

Bringing some retired workers back into the workplace could help a bit, but - again sadly - this seems more likely to be the result of the stick of "welfare reform" rather than the carrot of lower tax rates. It seems hard to raise the participation rate above 64 per cent or lower the unemployment rate below 5 per cent (see graph) without radical change. A good deal later, there will be some relief from the construction of new ports and other investments now under way and the training or import of new skilled and unskilled labour.

Fiscal tightening is a theoretical option, but to do this now, for example by raising the rate of the goods and services tax, would be to risk political suicide. Sir Humphrey would commend it as "courageous".

In the here-and-now, the only effective policy instrument is to raise interest rates. This is the job of the supposedly independent Reserve Bank board. Prime Minister John Howard has said that his election promise about interest rates was only that under the Coalition interest rates would be lower than they were under Labor in the late 1980s. He has also advised the nation, and therefore the Reserve Bank's board, that in his view there is no call for any interest rate rises.

He has consistently encouraged a dash for growth in this way, and so we have seen a long period of interest rates below neutral - in short, an easy monetary policy. The only problem is that excessive periods of easy monetary policy - interest rates "below neutral" - have to be brought to a close with periods of tight monetary policy - rates "above neutral" - once capacity constraints have been hit.

In an earlier article, in June 2002, we introduced a "Taylor Rule" as one way of defining the appropriate setting of monetary policy. Our forward-looking Taylor Rule for Australia was: The cash rate = the inflation rate + the real interest rate + 0.5*(target unemployment - forecast unemployment) + 0.5* (target inflation - forecast inflation).

The witch's brew in front of the RBA board is a cauldron comprising - at the bottom - an equilibrium real interest rate of 3.25 per cent and an actual inflation rate of 2.6 per cent, implying a neutral rate of 5.85 per cent. If forward inflation were used - a touch over 3 per cent given that "risks are on the upside" - the neutral rate becomes 6.25 per cent or a little more. But add to that gruel some gruesome seasoning: the continuing excess of domestic demand over potential supply of 1 per cent over the next year and - worse still - an excess of inflation over the mid-point of the target of 1 per cent.

A Taylor Rule would be recommending an interest rate 1 per cent higher than mere neutral. In other words, somewhere between 6.85 per cent and 7.5 per cent is entirely plausible in policy-making terms. Let's stir this steaming pot. Unless the board were to disregard the future, the spell to be cast involves moving rates up toward 7 per cent.

Contrast this with Monday's rate of 5.25 per cent and one can only conclude that the decision to raise rates by 0.25 per cent is only the first of several such increases. Domestic demand in the Australian economy might of course slow to an acceptable extent well before cash rates reach 7 per cent.

Indeed, Howard and the rest of the "no hike" school must believe the pressures on inflation will dissolve without policy action.

The highly geared position of Australian households is manifest reason for caution in tightening monetary policy. But in recognising the need for caution, we urge members of the "no hike" school to ask what happens if they are wrong. If demand keeps growing in the absence of rate hikes, and wages and inflation break out, there will be a painful slowdown imposed by far higher market rates at some stage. Far better to try to get ahead of the game and therefore, possibly, to head off this damaging scenario.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

9 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Henry Thornton (1760-1815) was a banker, M.P., Philanthropist, and a leading figure in the influential group of Evangelicals that was known as the Clapham set. His column is provided by the writers at www.henrythornton.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Henry Thornton

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Photo of Henry Thornton
Article Tools
Comment 9 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy