Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.

 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate


On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.


RSS 2.0

Is cultural studies inherently left wing?

By Terry Flew - posted Wednesday, 12 January 2005

The field of cultural studies is commonly seen, by both friends and critics as an adjunct of the political left. For its critics - like columnist Andrew Bolt, writer Keith Windschuttle and academic Gregory Melleuish - these studies exhibit obscure and complex theories, plus a political correctness which is in danger of strangling intellectual diversity in the arts and humanities.

Graeme Turner and Elspeth Probyn, leading academics in this field, respond by pointing out the diversity and social value of ideas emanating from cultural studies. Significantly, cultural studies is one of the few fields in which Australian researchers can claim international and recognised leadership.

Yet a deep tension remains. There are clearly a diverse range of positions, perspectives and issues considered in cultural studies. These positions are well known to those in the field. However, other academics have consistently drawn attention to the alignment of cultural study with the left of politics. If the main critical argument is that the validity of one’s arguments can be connected to their contribution to the political left, they do seem to have a point.


On many occasions various academics have affirmed their affinity with the left. Stuart Hall observed that cultural study’s purpose was to develop “organic intellectuals” who could critique a capitalist hegemony on behalf of “emerging movements” and possess the clout to challenge it. More recently, at the Illinois Crossroads conference, organisers insisted that for academics and researchers to remain silent is “to be in collusion with the Bush regime”.

The issue is not whether groupings of cultural studies academics may tend to be left-of-centre. Groups - teachers, graziers, builders, estate agents, radio-hosts, or retired officers- tend towards a political direction. Cass Sunstein’s Law of Group Polarisation suggests that this is inevitable. Rather the main question is whether cultural studies, as an area of teaching, research and scholarship, is inherently left wing?

I propose three, inter-related, points:

  1. Theoretical, and methodological resources of cultural studies are only comprehensible if linked to a left wing standpoint. 
  2. The degree of alignment of arguments within cultural studies towards a leftist-standpoint is such that one can determine the validity of any intellectual argument on its basis of relationship to left- politics. 
  3. If one did not, demonstrably, hold left wing views, it would be, in principle, impossible to have one’s work considered to within cultural studies, however much the study deals with any form of culture.

If these points constitute what cultural study is and does, and also what it means to be a cultural studies researcher and academic, I would argue that such an intellectual constitution of the discipline is unwise, even for those sympathetic to such leftist arguments and principles.

An historic problem with defining cultural study as inherently left, is that this links it to the “big theories” of the anti-Capitalist Left, notably Marxism, and in ways that not all cultural practitioners might agree with. The origins of such studies are linked to the “New Left” of the 60s and 70s, but its relationship to Marxism has always been tense.


Pioneers like Stuart Hall have theorised about the extent to which, in focussing focuses on popular culture and the complexities of ideology, cultural studies challenged left-wing orthodoxies. Indeed, more orthodox left wing academics, such as critical political economists, have expressed concern that - in focusing on the pleasures of consumption and popular culture - cultural studies is not left wing enough.

Another problem is that by defining cultural studies as “left wing”, we could lose insight into the complexities of culture itself, sieving everything through a political power-grid.

Popular culture will never actually be left wing.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

Article edited by Norman Ingram.
If you'd like to be a volunteer editor too, click here.

Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

3 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Terry Flew is Professor of Media and Communications at the Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. He is the author of Understanding Global Media (Palgrave 2007) and New Media: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2008). From 2006 to 2009, he has headed a project into citizen journalism in Australia through the Australian Research Council’s Linkage-Projects program, and The National Forum (publishers of On Line Opinion) have been participants in that project.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Terry Flew
Related Links
lan Anderson
Photo of Terry Flew
Article Tools
Comment 3 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Latest from QUT
 The science of reporting climate change
 Why schools need more than a business plan
 Suburban resilience
 Science unlimited
 Wake-up call for science

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy