Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

However it's discussed, abortion is the deadly price of choice

By Melinda Tankard Reist - posted Wednesday, 21 July 2004


The setting was a women's health conference in Canberra a few years ago. The speakers had talked about abortion as a "fertility control strategy", about removing the "embryonic implant", about pregnancy as oppression. The status of the foetus was "irrelevant", they said.

A woman rose in the audience, clearly agitated. She was, she said, "facing a conflict between her politics and the reality of removing quite well-formed foetuses from women". Working in a Sydney abortion clinic for the past year, she felt no one was facing what abortion was really about, she had difficulty advocating for it, she felt it violated women's bodies too. And it was one thing to be pro-choice - it was another to deal with dead babies every day.

The reaction was swift. She was told she had no right to express such doubts, that she was merely the provider of a service, that her personal feelings shouldn't come into it. The woman left the room. I didn't see her again.

Advertisement

How times have changed.

On August 8, ABC TV's Compass program will screen the British documentary, My Foetus. The film shows new 3-D ultrasound imaging of the foetus in the womb at nine, 12, 18 and 23 weeks, sucking their thumbs, jumping, tumbling. It also shows an abortion taking place, fetal remains being rinsed through a sieve, and pictures of 10, 11 and 21-week-old aborted foetuses. All the while, throughout the 24-minute film, is the pregnant film-maker Julia Black, her protruding belly like an exclamation mark, underscoring what it is all about.

Lest this be considered a pro-life conspiracy, Black has impeccable pro-choice credentials. Abortion is the Black family business. Dad is Tim Black, head of Marie Stopes International, Britain's largest abortion provider. Julia earned her stripes with an abortion at 21.

She would have grown up with the pro-abortion mantra: "No foetus can beat us." She may have heard about the 1985 rally in Spain where fresh foetal remains were held up to a cheering crowd of 3000 and other such events. Now she rubs pro-choice faces in these remains, using graphic images that UK pro-lifers have been arrested for showing. The reassembled body of a 21-week-old foetus lies alongside a tape measure.

"I decided to include images of aborted foetuses in my film because, however shocking, repulsive and confrontational they are, they represent the reality," Black told The Observer newspaper in the UK.

"When I interviewed a doctor about the unpleasantness of performing late abortions it was difficult to listen and not believe it was morally wrong," the Herald Sun quoted her. That doctor describes pulling babies apart piece by piece into a bucket between his legs.

Advertisement

Strangely, Black, while seemingly fearless, stops short of a more representative portrayal of the procedure only filming a four-week abortion. Most women don't even know they're pregnant then. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends against abortion under seven weeks.

But the film still packs a powerful punch.

Britain's Daily Telegraph journalist Lauren Booth, a pro-choicer who has also had an abortion, recoiled when watching the film: "My hand flew to my mouth in shock. I swallowed. I didn't want to say it but the word 'murder' came to my lips."

So why would Black make a film that prompts the word murder? Black told the online pro-choice forum: "Although I had all my reasons as to why abortion was a woman's right to choose I hadn't necessarily ever tested it by looking at abortion from the perspective of destroying the foetus and then defending my position."

Black wants the pro-choice movement to "reclaim the most powerful weapon the anti-abortion groups currently have - the foetus and the baby". She told ABC radio's Fran Kelly: "That's their goal, to make you see the foetus as a baby. I sort of found myself so much swept up in the whole emotion around that abortion equated, you know, [to] the killing of a baby."

But she can't allow herself to get too carried away. Black pulls herself back from the brink, concluding it is possible to be "opposed to what abortion actually is and still be pro-choice". Black's natural horror at the act cannot be allowed to dismantle the abortion edifice. She wants to have her foetus and abort it too.

Still, it's remarkable that in an industry where the right to choose means the right not to know, that she has gone as far as she has. Others have also admitted the baby can't be ignored any more. Naomi Wolf was probably the first. US abortion activist Judith Arcana observes:

We ... have dealt heavily ... in euphemism ... We have been unwilling to talk to women about what it means to abort a baby. We don't ever talk about babies ... The word "choice'' is the biggest euphemism. Some use the phrases "products of conception" and "contents of the uterus", or exchange the word pregnancy for the word foetus. I think it's wrong.

It was wrong that so many women in my book Giving Sorrow Words: Women's Stories of Grief After Abortion were not told the truth. "My baby had fingernails," said Ginger, when she found out, too late.

Black strips away the euphemism in a way no other pro-choicer has. It remains to be seen whether it will be accepted that women have a right to know what abortion does to their babies and how a lifetime of tears may be the price they pay.

Black's daughter Esme was born last September - her dimpled fingers reach out to us in the closing shots.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

This article was first published in The Australian on 12 July 2004.



Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

2 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Melinda Tankard Reist is a Canberra author, speaker, commentator and advocate with a special interest in issues affecting women and girls. Melinda is author of Giving Sorrow Words: Women's Stories of Grief after Abortion (Duffy & Snellgrove, 2000), Defiant Birth: Women Who Resist Medical Eugenics (Spinifex Press, 2006) and editor of Getting Real: Challenging the Sexualisation of Girls (Spinifex Press, 2009). Melinda is a founder of Collective Shout: for a world free of sexploitation (www.collectiveshout.org). Melinda blogs at www.melindatankardreist.com.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Melinda Tankard Reist
Photo of Melinda Tankard Reist
Article Tools
Comment 2 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy