Like what you've read?

On Line Opinion is the only Australian site where you get all sides of the story. We don't
charge, but we need your support. Here�s how you can help.

  • Advertise

    We have a monthly audience of 70,000 and advertising packages from $200 a month.

  • Volunteer

    We always need commissioning editors and sub-editors.

  • Contribute

    Got something to say? Submit an essay.


 The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
On Line Opinion logo ON LINE OPINION - Australia's e-journal of social and political debate

Subscribe!
Subscribe





On Line Opinion is a not-for-profit publication and relies on the generosity of its sponsors, editors and contributors. If you would like to help, contact us.
___________

Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Net-zero or none, Ley's still backing Albanese's severe immigration/housing crunch

By Stephen Saunders - posted Friday, 21 November 2025


Albo's ideological immigration/housing "solution" is matched by his renewables/net-zero straitjacket.

On the one hand, he licenses the huge Woodside expansion but refuses to exercise reservation over our natural-gas bonanza, even though gas sets the marginal price of electricity. Asian powers laugh their heads off, as we give the stuff away, whilst charging ourselves world prices.

On the other hand, there's his irrational insistence, that utopian net-zero "transformation" will make us into a "superpower". This has become central Treasury policy, propagated by a shoal of climate-energy quangos.

Advertisement

Even as evidence mounts, that his green-winners $22 billion Future Made in Australia is dubious . As is Australia's supposedly unrivalled capacity, to "capture" carbon in its rain forests and wide brown lands.

For Albo and the renewables elite , counterfactuals and hypotheticals "prove" renewables are cheaper or will be eventually. Yet everyday wallets still experience much higher electricity prices than last year. The left-retort is, it's all fossil-fuel's fault.

By dumping net-zero, does the Coalition now have a real point of difference?

In his recent op-ed, climate-energy shadow, Dan Tehan blurs that point-of-difference, reverting to global techno-optimism and carbon-capture nostrums:

"Breakthrough innovation drives energy abundance…scale-up of carbon capture central to global strategy…global point-of-source capture and direct air removal…nuclear power…bilateral cooperation…help Japan and Singapore with energy security and sequestering their carbon emissions"

Similar line to Labor - we can reverse or neutralise emissions, despite steeply rising population, and growing energy-generation needs. Both parties are seduced by that Abundance book.

Advertisement

Oh wait, Albo also promised jobs and growth. Except, his "million jobs" plus are matched by his million-plus migrants. Except, his job creation is overwhelmingly in government and non-market sectors, even in resource-rich WA.

In sum, the immigration-led economy's great, inside central Treasury propaganda . Just not that great, in productivity terms, with the worst slump for 60 years. Nor for ordinary voters, their real-wages sunk to 2011 levels, despite Treasurer's misleading boasts .

…as Ley walks back net-zero

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. All


Discuss in our Forums

See what other readers are saying about this article!

Click here to read & post comments.

10 posts so far.

Share this:
reddit this reddit thisbookmark with del.icio.us Del.icio.usdigg thisseed newsvineSeed NewsvineStumbleUpon StumbleUponsubmit to propellerkwoff it

About the Author

Stephen Saunders is a former APS public servant and consultant.

Other articles by this Author

All articles by Stephen Saunders

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Article Tools
Comment 10 comments
Print Printable version
Subscribe Subscribe
Email Email a friend
Advertisement

About Us Search Discuss Feedback Legals Privacy